Evaluation of Support Vector Machines and Adaptive Boosting in Classifying the Compliance Levels of Property and Building Taxpayers Using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)

Authors

  • Saumina Saumina Program Studi Magister Teknologi Informasi, Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Munirul Ula Program Studi Magister Teknologi Informasi, Universitas Malikussaleh
  • Asrianda Asrianda Program Studi Magister Teknologi Informasi, Universitas Malikussaleh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i4.13643

Keywords:

Adaptive Boosting, Area Under Curve, Land and Building Tax, Receiver Operating Characteristic, Support Vector Machine.

Abstract

Taxpayer compliance is a critical factor in increasing Property Tax (PBB) revenue. A low level of compliance can reduce local government revenue, making accurate classification methods essential for identifying taxpayer compliance. This study aims to compare the performance of Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost) in classifying property taxpayer compliance. The dataset consisted of 58,998 property tax records collected from Lhokseumawe City, covering the districts of Banda Sakti, Blang Mangat, Muara Dua, and Muara Satu. The research stages included data preprocessing, label encoding, Min–Max normalization, data splitting using 80:20 and 70:30 scenarios, model training, and performance evaluation using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and Area Under the Curve (AUC). Under the 80:20 data split, SVM achieved an accuracy of 92.89%, precision of 93.12%, recall of 98.81%, F1-score of 95.87%, and AUC of 80.59%, while AdaBoost achieved an accuracy of 92.86%, precision of 93.11%, recall of 98.78%, F1-score of 95.86%, and AUC of 80.76%. Under the 70:30 data split, SVM achieved an accuracy of 93.02%, precision of 93.18%, recall of 98.90%, F1-score of 95.95%, and AUC of 80.32%, whereas AdaBoost achieved an accuracy of 92.99%, precision of 93.18%, recall of 98.87%, F1-score of 95.93%, and AUC of 80.97%. Overall, both methods demonstrated comparable classification performance, while AdaBoost exhibited slightly better discriminative capability based on the AUC values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] F. Hidayat, A. Frinaldi, and Asnil, “Tax Contribution to Regional Original Income (PAD) Tanah Datar District,” Sustain. Theory, Pract. Policy, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40–52, 2023.

[2] Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 tentang Hubungan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintahan Daerah,” 2022.

[3] Pemerintah Kota Lhokseumawe, “Qanun Kota Lhokseumawe Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://lhokseumawekota.go.id/

[4] Badan Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah Kota Lhokseumawe, “Data Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Tahun 2025,” 2025.

[5] L. Chen, Y. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Support Vector Machine for Taxpayer Compliance Classification,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 215–223, 2023.

[6] A. H. Salman and W. A. Al-Jawher, “Performance Comparison of Support Vector Machines, AdaBoost, and Random Forest for Classification,” Int. J. Comput. Digit. Syst., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 89–99, 2024.

[7] J. Li, “Area under the ROC Curve has the most consistent evaluation for binary classification,” PlosOne, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1–28, 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316019.

[8] A. M. Carrington, D. G. Manuel, P. W. Fieguth, and others, “Deep ROC Analysis and AUC as Balanced Average Accuracy, for Improved Classifier Selection, Audit and Explanation,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 329–341, 2022, doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3145392.

[9] R. Binarto and H. Wibowo, “Klasifikasi Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak PBB-P2 Menggunakan Support Vector Machine,” J. Sist. Inf. Pajak, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2025.

[10] N. Nafisa and others, “Compliance of Land and Building Taxpayers with Support Vector Machine,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Community Development, 2024, pp. 210–217.

[11] H. Wibowo and R. Istianah, “Evaluasi Kinerja Metode Ensemble Adaptive Boosting untuk Klasifikasi Kepatuhan PBB-P2,” J. Data dan Pajak, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2025.

[12] N. Aula, M. Ula, and L. Rosnita, “Analisis Sentimen Review Customer Terhadap Perusahaan Ekspedisi Jne , J & T Express Dan Pos Indonesia Menggunakan Metode Support Vector Machine ( Svm ) Analysis Of Customer Review Sentiment To Jne , J & T Express And Pos Indonesia Expedition Companies Using Svm Method,” vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 2023.

[13] Yohannes, A. R. M. Ezar, S. Devella, and Meiriyama, “Jurnal Teknologi Terpadu Klasifikasi Motif Songket Palembang Menggunakan Support Vector Machine Berdasarkan Histogram Of Oriented Gradients,” J. Teknol. Terpadu Vol., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 143–149, 2023.

[14] I. K. Nti, O. Nyarko-boateng, F. A. Adekoya, and B. A. Weyori, “An empirical assessment of different kernel functions on the performance of support vector machines,” Bull. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 3403–3411, 2021, doi: 10.11591/eei.v10i6.3046.

[15] Z. Abidin, W Destian, and R. Umer, “Combining support vector machine with radial basis function kernel and information gain for sentiment analysis of movie reviews,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., pp. 1–5, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042157.

[16] I. A. Sapitri, M. Fikry, U. Islam, N. Sultan, and S. Kasim, “Pengklasifikasian sentimen ulasan aplikasi whatsapp pada google play store menggunakan support vector machine,” vol. 6, pp. 1–7, 2023, doi: 10.37600/tekinkom.v6i1.773.

[17] D. Rahmawati and Y. S. Nugroho, “Penerapan Support Vector Machine untuk analisis kepatuhan pajak daerah,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 612–620, 2022.

[18] R. R. Isnanto, A. Setiawan, and A. Nugroho, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode AdaBoost dan Support Vector Machine pada Klasifikasi Data Tidak Seimbang,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 245–254, 2023.

[19] Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire, “A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-Line Learning and an Application to Boosting,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci., vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 119–139, 1997.

[20] M. R. Fachrurrozi and E. Sutoyo, “Penerapan Adaptive Boosting untuk Meningkatkan Akurasi Klasifikasi Data Mining,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45–53, 2023.

[21] T. G. Dietterich, “Ensemble Methods in Machine Learning,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 2000, pp. 1–15.

[22] A. Wibowo and I. Kurniawan, “Optimasi Klasifikasi Menggunakan Algoritma AdaBoost pada Data Kompleks,” J. Inform. Mulawarman, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 189–197, 2023.

[23] H. Zhang, J. Zhang, and Q. Wang, “Robust AdaBoost Algorithms Against Noisy Data,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 512, pp. 379–390, 2020.

[24] S. Sun, C. Zhang, and G. Yu, “A Bayesian Perspective on AdaBoost,” Pattern Recognit., vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3823–3833, 2019.

[25] S. Kurnia, N. Nurdin, and A. Khaidar, “Perbandingan Metode Machine Learning Menggunakan Metode Support Vector Machine Dan Artificial Neural,” J. Inform. Kaputama, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2025.

[26] J. Li, “Area under the ROC Curve has the Most Consistent Evaluation for Binary Classification,” Patterns, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2024.101147.

[27] O. Rainio, “Evaluation metrics and statistical tests for machine learning,” Sci. Rep., pp. 1–14, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56706-x.

[28] N. S. Basuni and A. M. Siregar, “JURNAL RESTI Comparison of the Accuracy of Drug User Classification Models Using,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 5, no. 158, pp. 1348–1353, 2026.

[29] R. Nurhidayat and K. E. Dewi, “Penerapan Algoritma K-Nearest Neighbor Dan Fitur Ekstraksi N-Gram Dalam Analisis Sentimen Berbasis Aspek,” KOMPUTA J. Ilm. Komput. dan Inform., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 91–100, 2023.

[30] Y. Afrillia, L. Rosnita, D. Siska, M. Rigayatsyah, and Nurqamarina, “Analisis Sentimen Ciutan Twitter Terkait Penerapan Permendikbudristek Nomor 30 Tahun 2021 Menggunakan TextBlob dan Support Vector Machine,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 387–394, 2022.

[31] S. Sathyanarayanan and B. R. Tantri, “Confusion Matrix-Based Performance Evaluation Metrics,” vol. 27, no. 4, 2024.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-11

How to Cite

[1]
S. Saumina, M. Ula, and A. Asrianda, “Evaluation of Support Vector Machines and Adaptive Boosting in Classifying the Compliance Levels of Property and Building Taxpayers Using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)”, JAIC, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 3775–3787, Aug. 2026.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.