Polynomial Integrated PLS Regression for Predicting Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency of Ionic Liquids

Authors

  • Petrus Praditya Aswangga Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
  • Muhammad Akrom Research Center for Quantum Computing and Material Informatics, Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v9i4.10158

Keywords:

Corrosion Inhibitor, Ionic Liquid, Polynomial Function, Machine Learning, Partial Least Squares

Abstract

Corrosion degrades and weakens metal surfaces, leading to structural failure and significant safety hazards across various sectors. Data driven machine learning offers a rapid, cost-effective alternative to the expensive and time consuming traditional experimental methods by predicting inhibitor performance computationally. This study addresses the challenge of accurately predicting corrosion inhibition efficiency (CIE) of ionic liquid compounds. Integration of a polynomial function, especially in higher degrees, inevitably grows the dimensionality and escalates multicollinearity, but it captures deeper nonlinear interactions that the original variables alone would miss. To counterbalance this curse of dimensionality, Partial Least Squares (PLS) Regression was applied after polynomial integration to project the high-dimensional variables into a smaller set of predictors. Besides PLS, Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR) and Support Vector Regressor (SVR) models were also developed to establish baseline performance. Although these polynomial integrated models outperformed their baseline version, the Polynomial Integrated PLS outperformed their predictive performance, yielding R2, RMSE, and MAPE of 0.73, 4.730, and 3.73%, respectively. The result of this study highlights that the integration of a polynomial function can improve the predictive performance of PLS for corrosion inhibitors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. Akrom et al., “Artificial Intelligence Berbasis QSPR Dalam Kajian Inhibitor Korosi,” JoMMiT J. Multi Media dan IT, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 015–020, 2023, doi: 10.46961/jommit.v7i1.721.

[2] C. Verma, E. E. Ebenso, and M. A. Quraishi, “Ionic liquids as green and sustainable corrosion inhibitors for metals and alloys: An overview,” J. Mol. Liq., vol. 233, no. 2016, pp. 403–414, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.02.111.

[3] S. Budi, M. Akrom, G. A. Trisnapradika, T. Sutojo, and W. A. E. Prabowo, “Optimization of Polynomial Functions on the NuSVR Algorithm Based on Machine Learning: Case Studies on Regression Datasets,” Sci. J. Informatics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 151–158, 2023, doi: 10.15294/sji.v10i2.43929.

[4] V. F. Adiprasetya, M. Akrom, and G. Alfa Trisnapradika, “Investigasi Efisiensi Penghambatan Korosi Senyawa Quinoxaline Berbasis Machine Learning A Study on the Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency of Quinoxaline Compounds Utilizing Machine Learning,” J. Ilm. Tek. Kim., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 2460–8203, 2024.

[5] W. Herowati et al., “Prediction of Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency Based on Machine Learning for Pyrimidine Compounds: A Comparative Study of Linear and Non-linear Algorithms,” KnE Eng., vol. 2024, pp. 68–77, 2024, doi: 10.18502/keg.v6i1.15350.

[6] A. H. Alamri and N. Alhazmi, “Development of data driven machine learning models for the prediction and design of pyrimidine corrosion inhibitors,” J. Saudi Chem. Soc., vol. 26, no. 6, p. 101536, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jscs.2022.101536.

[7] T. W. Quadri et al., “Multilayer perceptron neural network-based QSAR models for the assessment and prediction of corrosion inhibition performances of ionic liquids,” Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 214, no. August, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111753.

[8] S. Budi et al., “Implementation of Polynomial Functions to Improve the Accuracy of Machine Learning Models in Predicting the Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency of Pyridine-Quinoline Compounds as Corrosion Inhibitors,” KnE Eng., vol. 2024, pp. 78–87, 2024, doi: 10.18502/keg.v6i1.15351.

[9] N. V. Putranto, M. Akrom, and G. A. Trinapradika, “Implementasi Fungsi Polinomial pada Algoritma Gradient Boosting Regressor: Studi Regresi pada Dataset Obat-Obatan Kadaluarsa Sebagai Material Antikorosi,” J. Teknol. dan Manaj. Inform., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 172–182, 2023, doi: 10.26905/jtmi.v9i2.11192.

[10] B. J. Rana, N. A. Setiyanto, and M. Akrom, “Prediction of Corrosion Inhibitor Efficiency Based on Quinoxaline Compounds Using Polynomial Regression,” J. Appl. Informatics Comput., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 376–381, 2025, doi: 10.30871/jaic.v9i2.9031.

[11] I. B. Obot, D. D. Macdonald, and Z. M. Gasem, “Density functional theory (DFT) as a powerful tool for designing new organic corrosion inhibitors: Part 1: An overview,” Corros. Sci., vol. 99, pp. 1–30, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.01.037.

[12] L. B. V. de Amorim, G. D. C. Cavalcanti, and R. M. O. Cruz, “The choice of scaling technique matters for classification performance,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 133, pp. 1–37, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109924.

[13] M. A. Siddiqi and W. Pak, “Optimizing filter-based feature selection method flow for intrusion detection system,” Electron., vol. 9, no. 12, pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.3390/electronics9122114.

[14] H. Akoglu, “User’s guide to correlation coefficients,” Turkish J. Emerg. Med., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 91–93, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001.

[15] A. K. Nandi, “Data Modeling with Polynomial Representations and Autoregressive Time-Series Representations, and Their Connections,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 110412–110424, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000860.

[16] P. Xu, X. Ji, M. Li, and W. Lu, “Small data machine learning in materials science,” npj Comput. Mater., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41524-023-01000-z.

[17] S. Bates, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, “Cross-Validation: What Does It Estimate and How Well Does It Do It?,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 119, no. 546, pp. 1434–1445, 2024, doi: 10.1080/01621459.2023.2197686.

[18] G. Varoquaux, “Cross-validation failure: Small sample sizes lead to large error bars,” Neuroimage, vol. 180, pp. 68–77, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.061.

[19] V. González, R. Giraldo, and V. Leiva, “PLS1-MD: A partial least squares regression algorithm for solving missing data problems,” Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 240, no. March, p. 104876, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2023.104876.

[20] J. Gao, “ R-Squared (R 2 ) – How much variation is explained? ,” Res. Methods Med. Heal. Sci., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 104–109, 2024, doi: 10.1177/26320843231186398.

[21] C. Miller, T. Portlock, D. M. Nyaga, and J. M. O’Sullivan, “A review of model evaluation metrics for machine learning in genetics and genomics,” Front. Bioinforma., vol. 4, no. September, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2024.1457619.

[22] D. Chicco, M. J. Warrens, and G. Jurman, “The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation,” PeerJ Comput. Sci., vol. 7, pp. 1–24, 2021, doi: 10.7717/PEERJ-CS.623.

[23] A. Maqbool, A. Khalad, and N. Z. Khan, “Prediction of corrosion rate for friction stir processed WE43 alloy by combining PSO-based virtual sample generation and machine learning,” J. Magnes. Alloy., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1518–1528, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jma.2024.04.012.

[24] M. Akrom, S. Rustad, and H. K. Dipojono, “A machine learning approach to predict the efficiency of corrosion inhibition by natural product-based organic inhibitors,” Phys. Scr., vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2024, doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/ad28a9.

[25] I. P. Aldiansah and M. Akrom, “Effect of Virtual Sample Generation in Predicting Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency on Pyridazine,” J. Appl. Informatics Comput., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 382–389, 2025, doi: 10.30871/jaic.v9i2.9131.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-07

How to Cite

[1]
Petrus Praditya Aswangga and Muhammad Akrom, “Polynomial Integrated PLS Regression for Predicting Corrosion Inhibition Efficiency of Ionic Liquids”, JAIC, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1695–1700, Aug. 2025.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 25 26 27 28 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.