Comparison of Sobel, Prewitt, and Canny Edge Detection Methods in Digital Images
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i3.12860Keywords:
Canny, Edge Detection, F-measure, Prewitt, SobelAbstract
Edge detection is a fundamental operation in digital image processing, enabling identification of object boundaries in an image. This study presents a systematic comparative evaluation of three widely used edge detection algorithms Sobel, Prewitt, and Canny applied to a dataset of 20 grayscale images (512×512 pixels) from the USC-SIPI Image Database, spanning four object categories: simple geometric objects, complex textures, low-noise conditions, and medium-noise conditions. Each method was evaluated using four metrics: Mean Square Error (MSE), Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), precision/recall/F-measure (with Canny output as the reference ground truth for Sobel and Prewitt), and average computational time. All experiments were conducted in Python 3.10 with OpenCV 4.7 on a dedicated Intel Core i7 (11th Gen) workstation running Ubuntu 22.04 LTS with 16 GB RAM to ensure fair benchmarking. Results show that the Canny method consistently outperforms the others in detection quality, achieving the lowest average MSE (7.26), the highest average PSNR (40.06 dB), and the best F-measure (0.91), albeit at a 3–4× higher computational cost (8.76 ms vs. ~2.4 ms for Sobel/Prewitt). Sobel and Prewitt provide comparable speed with lower precision, making them suitable for real-time applications. Notably, under medium-noise conditions, Canny's MSE advantage widens markedly, highlighting its superior noise robustness. A brief comparison with modern deep learning-based approaches (HED, BDCN) contextualises classical methods within the current state of the art. The study concludes that Canny is the superior choice for high-accuracy tasks, while Sobel and Prewitt remain practical for latency-constrained environments..
Downloads
References
[1] R. C. Gonzalez and R. E. Woods, Digital Image Processing, 4th ed. Pearson Education, 2018.
[2] R. Szeliski, Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications, 2nd ed. Springer, 2022.
[3] M. S. Nixon and A. S. Aguado, Feature Extraction and Image Processing for Computer Vision, 4th ed. Academic Press, 2019.
[4] J. Canny, "A computational approach to edge detection," IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 679-698, 1986.
[5] G. T. Shrivakshan and C. Chandrasekar, "A comparison of various edge detection techniques used in image processing," Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 269-276, 2012.
[6] USC-SIPI, "The USC-SIPI Image Database," Univ. of Southern California, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://sipi.usc.edu/database/
[7] OpenCV Development Team, "OpenCV documentation: Edge detection," 2024. [Online]. Available: https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/
[8] R. Maini and H. Aggarwal, "Study and comparison of various image edge detection techniques," Int. J. Image Process., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2009.
[9] S. Gupta and S. G. Mazumdar, "Sobel edge detection algorithm," Int. J. Comput. Sci. Manag. Res., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1578-1583, 2013.
[10] Dharampal and V. Mutneja, "Methods of image edge detection: A review," J. Elect. Electron. Syst., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1-5, 2015.
[11] S. M. Bhandarkar and H. Zhang, "Edge detection using neural networks with application to medical image processing," IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 884-901, 1997.
[12] F. U. Siddiqui and N. A. M. Isa, "Enhanced moving object segmentation algorithm for noisy video sequences," Signal Process., vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 1966-1975, 2011.
[13] G. Bradski and A. Kaehler, Learning OpenCV: Computer Vision with the OpenCV Library. O'Reilly Media, 2008.
[14] D. Ziou and S. Tabbone, "Edge detection techniques: An overview," Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 537-559, 1998.
[15] S. Xie and Z. Tu, "Holistically-nested edge detection," in Proc. IEEE ICCV, 2015, pp. 1395-1403.
[16] J. He, S. Zhang, M. Yang, Y. Shan, and T. Huang, "Bi-directional cascade network for perceptual edge detection," in Proc. IEEE CVPR, 2019, pp. 3828-3837.
[17] W. Ke, J. Chen, J. Jiao, G. Zhao, and Q. Ye, "SRN: Side-output residual network for object symmetry detection in the wild," in Proc. IEEE CVPR, 2017. (Evaluation protocol reference: D. R. Martin, C. C. Fowlkes, and J. Malik, "Learning to detect natural image boundaries using local brightness, color, and texture cues," IEEE Trans. PAMI, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 530-549, 2004)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Diana Diana, Delima Agustina, Dian Yunita Situmorang, Dasril Kholid, Ahmad Rizki Pratama
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) ) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
