Usability Analysis of Online Travel Agent Applications Using System Usability Scale and Electroencephalography

Authors

  • Ayunda Larasati Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
  • Tranggono Tranggono Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v9i4.10145

Keywords:

EEG, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Online Travel Agents, SUS

Abstract

In the digital era, technology has transformed the travel and tourism industry, with Online Travel Agents (OTAs) like Traveloka, Tiket.com, and Agoda offering convenient trip planning through digital platforms. Despite their popularity, issues such as navigation difficulties and unclear information still affect user satisfaction. This study aims to evaluate the usability of OTA applications using the System Usability Scale (SUS) based on the ISO 9241-11 standard and Electroencephalography (EEG) to analyze user physiological responses. The test involved 10 respondents and 4 task scenarios. The results showed that Traveloka achieved a SUS score of 85, with 95% effectiveness and 0.023 goals per second efficiency. Tiket.com scored 79 with 92.5% effectiveness and 0.026 goals per second efficiency, while Agoda scored 70 with 87.5% effectiveness and 0.016 goals per second efficiency. EEG data revealed that Traveloka and Tiket.com had the highest average alpha wave values, indicating respondents felt nervous or anxious, whereas Agoda showed higher beta wave values, suggesting respondents were calm and aware without full concentration. This study highlights that the usability of OTA applications is influenced by user experience, which can be measured subjectively through SUS and more deeply using EEG data to understand physiological responses when interacting with the application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] H. Nurhayati, “Most popular online travel agencies among consumers in Indonesia as of June 2023,” Statista.com, 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1200620/indonesia-most-used-online-travel-agencies/ (diakses 12 Februari 2025).

[2] N. Tashandra, “Survei: 44 Persen Orang Pakai Aplikasi Travel Online untuk Rencanakan Liburan,” Kompas, 2022. https://travel.kompas.com/read/2022/07/08/173300627/survei--44-persen-orang-pakai-aplikasi-travel-online-untuk-rencanakan-liburan?page=all

[3] A. A. Septarina, A. A. Arifiyanto, Usman, dan M. Irsyad, “Usability Evaluation Satu Sehat Application Using Heuristic Evaluation Method,” G-Tech : Jurnal Teknologi Terapan, vol. 9, no. 1, hal. 563–569, 2025.

[4] Harmayani dan P. Simamora, “Interaksi Manusia dan Komputer dalam Ilmu Filsafat,” Jurnal Deli Sains Informatika, vol. 2, no. 2, hal. 5, 2023, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://jurnal.unds.ac.id/index.php/dsi/article/view/199%0Ahttps://jurnal.unds.ac.id/index.php/dsi/article/download/199/199

[5] ISO, “Ergonomics of human-system interaction Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts.,” 2018. https://www.iso.org/standard/63500.html%0D (diakses 2 Februari 2025).

[6] S. R. Wicaksono, Usability Testing, 1 ed., no. Maret. Malang: Seribu Bintang, 2023.

[7] A. A. Triwardani, M. H. Ulfiah, dan F. Dzatama, “Evaluasi Pengalaman Pengguna Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale (SUS) Pada Aplikasi Access By KAI,” INOTEK, vol. 8, hal. 944–951, 2024.

[8] J. Brooke, “SUS : A Retrospective,” Journal Of Usability Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, hal. 29–40, 2013.

[9] T. D. Qurohman, F. Indriyani, U. Bina, S. Informatika, dan P. Korespondensi, “Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna SIMRS pada RSUD Tarakan Jakarta Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale,” Remik: Riset dan E-Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Komputer, vol. 8, no. 4, hal. 1068–1080, 2024.

[10] Mairistiansyah dan K. Nisa, “Analisis Usability Aplikasi Ngetem Menggunakan Metode System Usability Scale (Studi Kasus PT. Seino Indomobil Logisctic),” Jurnal Eksplora Informatika, vol. 14, no. 1, hal. 43–54, 2024, doi: 10.30864/eksplora.v14i1.1083.

[11] Z. Khakim dan S. Kusrohmaniah, “Dasar - Dasar Electroencephalography (EEG) bagi Riset Psikologi,” Buletin Psikologi, vol. 29, no. 1, hal. 92, 2021, doi: 10.22146/buletinpsikologi.52328.

[12] R. D. Astuti, B. Suhardi, P. W. Laksono, dan N. Susanto, “Investigating the Relationship between Noise Exposure and Human Cognitive Performance: Attention, Stress, and Mental Workload Based on EEG Signals Using Power Spectrum Density,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 14, no. 7, hal. 1–18, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14072699.

[13] L. E. Ismailid dan W. Karwowski, “Applications of EEG indices for the quantification of human cognitive: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 15, no. 12, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242857.

[14] G. M. Zamroni, B. Saphira, F. N. Akhmad, dan F. A. Zahrah, “Electroencephalogram as a Validation Method in Usability Testing,” Jurnal Informatika, vol. 11, no. 1, hal. 97–105, 2023.

[15] Interaxon, “MuseIO | Available Data,” 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20181105231756/http://developer.choosemuse.com/tools/available-data#Absolute_Band_Powers (diakses 3 Juli 2025).

[16] J. Clutterbuck, “Software Mind Monitor,” 2015. https://mind-monitor.com/#page-top (diakses 7 Maret 2025).

[17] F. M. Garcia-Moreno, M. Bermudez-Edo, J. L. Garrido, dan M. J. Rodríguez-Fórtiz, “Reducing Response Time in Motor Imagery Using A Headband and Deep Learning,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 23, hal. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20236730.

[18] S. M. Cahyani dan U. M. D. Fadli, “Peran Online Travel Agent Dalam Meningkatkan Penjualan Kamar Pada Hotel Swiss Belinn Karawang,” GLORY (Global Leadership Organizational Research in Management), vol. 2, no. 3, hal. 194–206, 2024.

[19] J. Nielsen, “Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users,” 2000. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/ (diakses 7 Juli 2025).

[20] L. Faulkner, “Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing,” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, vol. 35, no. 3, hal. 379–383, 2003, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03195514

[21] J. Brooke, “SUS: A ‘Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale,” Usability Evaluation In Industry, vol. Chapter 21, hal. 207–212, 1996, doi: 10.1201/9781498710411-35.

[22] T. Wahyuningrum, Mengukur Usability Perangkat Lunak. Yogyakarta: Deepublisher, 2021.

[23] M. S. Tuloli, R. Patalangi, dan R. Takdir, “Pengukuran Tingkat Usability Sistem Aplikasi e-Rapor Menggunakan Metode Usability Testing dan SUS,” Jambura Journal of Informatics, vol. 4, no. 1, hal. 13–26, 2022, doi: 10.37905/jji.v4i1.13411.

[24] K. Blocka dan D. Yetman, “EEG (Electroencephalogram) Overview,” Healthline, 2021. https://www.healthline.com/health/eeg (diakses 28 Maret 2025).

[25] P. T. Nugraha, I. M. Sukarsa, dan N. kadek D. Rusjayanthi, “Usability Testing Sistem Love Bali Menggunakan Teknik Performance Measurement dan Concurrent Think Aloud (CTA),” JITTER : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi dan Komputer, vol. 3, no. 2, hal. 1137, 2022, doi: 10.24843/jtrti.2022.v03.i02.p13.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-09

How to Cite

[1]
A. Larasati and T. Tranggono, “Usability Analysis of Online Travel Agent Applications Using System Usability Scale and Electroencephalography”, JAIC, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1935–1944, Aug. 2025.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.