Performance Comparison of SqueezeNet Implementing a Dendritic Neural Model for Brain Disease Image Classification

Authors

  • Riandika Fathur Rochim Universitas Udayana
  • I GN Lanang Wijayakusuma Universitas Udayana
  • I Putu Winada Gautama Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i2.12196

Keywords:

Brain Disease, CNN, Deep Learning, Dendritic Neural Model, SqueezeNet

Abstract

In this study, a comparative analysis is conducted between a pre-trained SqueezeNet v1.1 model and a modified SqueezeNet architecture integrating a dendritic neural model (DNM) into the classifier layer for eight-class brain disease classification using MRI images. The proposed modification replaces the standard linear classifier with a dendritic-based processing mechanism to enhance nonlinear representation at the classification stage. Experiments are performed on an MRI-based brain medical image dataset, and model performance is evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and confusion matrix analysis. The results show that the SqueezeNet model integrated with DNM achieves a significant accuracy improvement of approximately 5%, increasing from 90.33% to 95.61%, compared to the standard SqueezeNet model. This performance gain is accompanied by a moderate increase in model complexity, with the parameter count rising by approximately 1.69% (from 726.6K to 738.9K) and a longer convergence time (40 epochs versus 22 epochs). Overall, the findings indicate that incorporating DNM into a lightweight CNN architecture such as SqueezeNet can effectively improve medical image classification performance while maintaining reasonable computational efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. S. Yadav and S. M. Jadhav, “Deep convolutional neural network based medical image classification for disease diagnosis,” J Big Data, vol. 6, no. 1, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s40537-019-0276-2.

[2] M. Aamir, Z. Rahman, U. A. Bhatti, W. A. Abro, J. A. Bhutto, and Z. He, “An automated deep learning framework for brain tumor classification using MRI imagery,” Sci Rep, vol. 15, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02209-2.

[3] A. Suganya and S. L. Aarthy, “Application of Deep Learning in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Disease: A Review,” Curr Med Imaging, vol. 20, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.2174/1573405620666230328113721.

[4] S. Ahmed, S. K. Sakib, and A. B. Das, “Can Large Language Models Challenge CNNs in Medical Image Analysis?,” Jun. 2025, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23503

[5] M. Li, Y. Jiang, Y. Zhang, and H. Zhu, “Medical image analysis using deep learning algorithms,” Front Public Health, vol. 11, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1273253.

[6] A. O. A. Deheyab et al., “AN OVERVIEW of CHALLENGES in MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Association for Computing Machinery, Dec. 2022, pp. 511–516. doi: 10.1145/3584202.3584278.

[7] F. N. Iandola, S. Han, M. W. Moskewicz, K. Ashraf, W. J. Dally, and K. Keutzer, “SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model size,” Nov. 2016, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.07360

[8] M. Tsivgoulis, T. Papastergiou, and V. Megalooikonomou, “An improved SqueezeNet model for the diagnosis of lung cancer in CT scans,” Machine Learning with Applications, vol. 10, p. 100399, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.MLWA.2022.100399.

[9] X. Wen, M. Zhou, A. Albeshri, L. Huang, X. Luo, and D. Ning, “Improving Classification Performance in Dendritic Neuron Models through Practical Initialization Strategies,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 6, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24061729.

[10] Y. ; Yang et al., “Yet Another Effective Dendritic Neuron Model Based on the Activity of Excitation and Inhibition,” Mathematics 2023, Vol. 11, Page 1701, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 1701, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/MATH11071701.

[11] Q. Du, Z. Liu, Y. Song, N. Wang, Z. Ju, and S. Gao, “A Lightweight Dendritic ShuffleNet for Medical Image Classification,” IEICE Trans Inf Syst, vol. E108D, no. 7, pp. 744–751, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1587/transinf.2024EDP7059.

[12] N. Wang, Q. Du, Z. Yuan, Y. Gao, R.-L. Wang, and S. Gao, “Dendritic Aggregated Residual Deep Learning for Meningioma MRI Diagnosis,” IEICE Trans Inf Syst, vol. E108.D, no. 8, pp. 1016–1019, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1587/transinf.2024edl8049.

[13] Y. Ding, J. Yu, C. Gu, S. Gao, and C. Zhang, “A Multi-In and Multi-Out Dendritic Neuron Model and its Optimization,” Sep. 2023, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07791

[14] L. Fischer et al., “Dendritic Mechanisms for In Vivo Neural Computations and Behavior,” in Journal of Neuroscience, Society for Neuroscience, Nov. 2022, pp. 8460–8467. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1132-22.2022.

[15] A. O. Komendantov and G. A. Ascoli, “Dendritic excitability and neuronal morphology as determinants of synaptic efficacy,” J Neurophysiol, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 1847–1866, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1152/jn.01235.2007.

[16] N. A. Ranggianto, A. P. Segara, D. Wijonarko, A. Andrianto, and M. H. Arief, “Procedural Content Generation pada Level Gim Sokoban Menggunakan Model Hybrid GPT2 dan Algoritma Genetika,” remik, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 963–974, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.33395/remik.v9i3.15188.

[17] A. M. Taha, S. A. Aly, and M. F. Darwish, “Detecting Glioma, Meningioma, and Pituitary Tumors, and Normal Brain Tissues based on Yolov11 and Yolov8 Deep Learning Models,” Mar. 2025, Accessed: Oct. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.00189v1

Downloads

Published

2026-04-16

How to Cite

[1]
R. F. Rochim, I. G. L. Wijayakusuma, and I. P. W. Gautama, “Performance Comparison of SqueezeNet Implementing a Dendritic Neural Model for Brain Disease Image Classification”, JAIC, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1151–1158, Apr. 2026.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.