EVALUASI KINERJA KALIBRASI DIAL HEIGHT GAUGE BERDASARKAN JIS B 7517-2018: ANALISIS DEVIASI DAN PENILAIAN KESESUAIAN

Authors

  • Stephen Alexander Sembiring Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Politeknik Negeri Batam
  • Aulia Fajrin Program Studi Teknologi Rekayasa Metalurgi, Politeknik Negeri Batam
  • Annisa Fyona Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Politeknik Negeri Batam
  • Mutiarani Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Politeknik Negeri Batam
  • Hendra Butar Butar Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Politeknik Negeri Batam
  • Ita Wijayanti Program Studi Teknik Mesin, Politeknik Negeri Batam

Keywords:

Repeatability, Deviation, Height Gauge, JIS B 7517-2018, Calibration, Measurement Uncertainty

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of a Mitutoyo dial height gauge (resolution 0.01 mm, range 0–600 mm) in accordance with JIS B 7517-2018 through deviation analysis and repeatability assessment at nine set points (20–600 mm), using a certified Grade 0 gauge block as reference standard under laboratory conditions of 20 ± 1 °C and 50–60% relative humidity. The maximum deviation recorded was −0.0033 mm (at the 20 mm set point), below the Maximum Permissible Error (MPE) of ±0.020 mm per JIS B 7517-2018. The largest repeatability value was 0.01 mm, satisfying the standard limit. All nine measurement points passed the conformance criteria. A consistent negative deviation pattern at set points ≤ 200 mm indicates a minor systematic error correlated with Abbe principal violation at short measurement ranges, with direct implications for quality assurance in precision manufacturing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] F. Lv, C. Hu, W. Du, and X. Wang, “Dimension Measurement and Quality Control during the Finishing Process of Large-Size and High-Precision Components,” Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2022, pp. 1–8, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/3955974.

[2] S. Kalpakjian and S. R. Schmid, Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, 7th ed, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, 2014.

[3] Imam Prasetyo and Alfa Yuliana Dewi, Metrologi Industri & Kontrol Kualitas dalam Bidang Teknik. Pekalongan: NEM, 2025.

[4] J. 200 Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, “International Vocabulary of Metrology (VIM),” Paris, 2012.

[5] E. of M. D. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM),” Paris, 2020.

[6] ISO, ISO 9001:2015. Quality Management Systems: Requirements. Switzerland, 2015.

[7] Japanese Industrial Standards Committee, JIS B 7517:2018. Method of Calibration for Height Gauges. Japan, 2018.

[8] ISO, ISO 13225:2012. Dimensional Measuring Instruments: Height Gauges. Switzerland, 2012.

[9] W. de O. S. Soares, R. S. Peruchi, R. A. V. Silva, and P. Rotella Junior, “Gage R&R studies in measurement system analysis: A systematic literature review,” Qual. Eng., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 382–403, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/08982112.2022.2069505.

[10] V. Samelova, J. Pekarova, F. Bradac, J. Vetiska, M. Samel, and R. Jankovych, “Experimental Study of Ambient Temperature Influence on Dimensional Measurement Using an Articulated Arm Coordinate Measuring Machine,” Metrology, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 45, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3390/metrology5030045.

[11] T. Doiron and J. Stoup, “Uncertainty and dimensional calibrations,” J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., vol. 102, no. 6, p. 647, Nov. 1997, doi: 10.6028/jres.102.044.

[12] X. Li, W. Gao, H. Muto, Y. Shimizu, S. Ito, and S. Dian, “A six-degree-of-freedom surface encoder for precision positioning of a planar motion stage,” Precis. Eng., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 771–781, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2013.03.005.

[13] Z. Zhang et al., “Design method and error analysis of 3D measurement system in accordance with the Abbe principle,” Measurement, vol. 252, p. 117369, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2025.117369.

[14] Komite Akreditasi Nasional, Panduan Kalibrasi Alat Ukur Dimensi: Height Gauge. Indonesia, 2021.

[15] H. Haitjema, “Calibration of Displacement Laser Interferometer Systems for Industrial Metrology,” Sensors, vol. 19, no. 19, p. 4100, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.3390/s19194100.

[16] J. Schaude and T. Hausotte, “Uncertainty-based determination of recalibration dates,” International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, vol. 15, p. 2, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1051/ijmqe/2023017.

[17] W. Gao et al., “Machine tool calibration: Measurement, modeling, and compensation of machine tool errors,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 187, p. 104017, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2023.104017.

[18] D. Dalalah, “Evaluation of gauges in measurement systems,” Production Engineering, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 929–945, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11740-023-01211-9.

[19] J. G. Salsbury, Test Uncertainty, 2nd ed. Westerville: Mitutoyo America Corporation, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-28

How to Cite

Sembiring, S. A., Fajrin, A., Fyona, A., Mutiarani, Butar Butar, H., & Wijayanti, I. (2026). EVALUASI KINERJA KALIBRASI DIAL HEIGHT GAUGE BERDASARKAN JIS B 7517-2018: ANALISIS DEVIASI DAN PENILAIAN KESESUAIAN. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Riset Terapan (JATRA), 8(1), 87–92. Retrieved from https://jurnal.polibatam.ac.id/index.php/JATRA/article/view/12996

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Teknologi Dan Riset Terapan (JATRA) - Juni 2026

Section

Research Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>