Fast Ethernet Interface Capacity Evaluation Based on Actual Contention Ratio

Authors

  • Lifyana Nailah Azzahra Department of Informatics, Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung (ITENAS)
  • Ahmad Ripai Department of Informatics, Institut Teknologi Nasional Bandung (ITENAS)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i5.13700

Keywords:

Bandwidth Overbooking, Contention Ratio, Fast Ethernet, MikroTik, Network Capacity Evaluation

Abstract

Bandwidth overbooking is widely adopted by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to improve bandwidth utilization efficiency. However, excessive overbooking may increase the risk of interface saturation and degrade network performance. This study evaluates the capacity of a Fast Ethernet interface by analyzing the actual contention ratio in a MikroTik-based network. A quantitative observational approach was employed through passive traffic monitoring using the RouterOS Graphing feature over a continuous 14-day observation period during peak hours (19:00–23:00 WIB). The observed network consisted of 67 active clients with a Total Allocated Bandwidth (TAB) of 460 Mbps distributed over a 100 Mbps Fast Ethernet interface. The highest outbound traffic recorded during the observation period was 76.26 Mbps, resulting in an actual contention ratio of approximately 1:6. The results indicate that the actual contention ratio of 1:6 does not lead to interface saturation, with utilization reaching 76.26% of the available interface capacity and a remaining headroom of 23.74 Mbps. These findings demonstrate that the current bandwidth allocation strategy remains feasible strictly from an interface capacity standpoint, based on interface headroom availability. Nevertheless, because this feasibility has not been validated against Quality of Service (QoS) metrics (e.g., latency, jitter, packet loss), upgrading the distribution infrastructure to Gigabit Ethernet is recommended to enhance network scalability and mitigate future interface saturation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] B. A. Prakosa, Y. Afrianto, S. Agustiyan, and I. H. Setiadi, "Evaluating Bandwidth Management Techniques on Mikrotik Routers: A Multiple Linear Regression Approach," Ingénierie des Systèmes d'Information, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1227–1236, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.290429

[2] C. Sexton, N. Marchetti, and L. A. DaSilva, "On Provisioning Slices and Overbooking Resources in Service Tailored Networks of the Future," IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1298–1311, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2020.3004443

[3] A. Ardiansyah et al., "Analysis of Quality of Service Bandwidth Management on Computer Network Using Mikrotik RB951Ui-2HnD," Techno: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33480/techno.v18i1.2164

[4] D. N. Ilham et al., "Optimization of Computer Network Performance through Traffic Management and Bandwidth Allocation," PERFECT: Journal of Information System and Technology, vol. 3, no. 1, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62671/perfect.v3i1.243

[5] R. Rudiyanto and S. D. Asri, "Bandwidth Optimization of Mikrotik-Based School Wi-Fi Networks Using Queue Tree and QoS," Journal of Computer Science and Informatics Engineering, vol. 4, no. 4, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55537/cosie.v4i4.1284

[6] A. Saputra et al., "Bandwidth Management using Per Connection Queue and Queue Tree: A Case Study on a High School Network," Emerging Information Science and Technology Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/eist.v5i1.22376

[7] Anton, M. Wahyudi, C. A. Theofilus, H. Supendar, H. Amalia, S. Alfarizi, and L. Pujiastuti, "Analysis and Implementation of the PCQ Method in MikroTik-Based Bandwidth Management," Infortech, vol. 8, no. 1, 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31294/infortech.v8i1.12752

[8] Seyhan and J. Triloka, "Implementation of Mikrotik Firewall and QoS for Secure and Efficient Internet Networking," Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Pendidikan, vol. 18, no. 2, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jtip.v18i2.1056

[9] K. S. Syahrani, Suroso, and E. Susanti, "Analysis of Mikrotik Network Bandwidth Management Using the Hierarchical Token Bucket Method at the Sriwijaya State Polytechnic," Jurnal Inovtek Polbeng - Seri Informatika, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1260–1270, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35314/isi.v10i2.836

[10] M. J. Gumeular and D. R. Akbi, "Optimalisasi QoS Manajemen Bandwidth Menggunakan PCQ dan FQ-Codel Berbasis Mikrotik," Repositor, vol. 7, no. 2, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/repositor.v7i2.34417

[11] M. A. Shofa, "Implementasi Manajemen Bandwidth pada Mikrotik Menggunakan Metode Hierarchical Token Bucket dan Queue Tree," Jurnal Ilmu Teknik dan Komputer (JITKOM), vol. 9, no. 1, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22441/jitkom.v9i1.008

[12] R. B. S. Wibowo and Y. Komalasari, "Penerapan Quality of Service Menggunakan Hierarchical Token Bucket pada Jaringan Internet Menggunakan Mikrotik di PT. Triwall Indonesia," Jurnal Komputer dan Aplikasi, vol. 3, no. 2, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.70052/jka.v3i2.734

[13] I. Awaliyani and R. A. Aziz, "Analisis Quality of Service (QoS) Jaringan Internet Pelanggan pada ISP Jalurdata.Net Menggunakan Metode Hierarchical Token Bucket (HTB) dan Per Connection Queue (PCQ)," Jurnal Algoritma, vol. 21, no. 2, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33364/algoritma.v21i2.1792

[14] A. Fadli and M. A. Asis, "Bandwidth Management Analysis Using Hierarchical Token Bucket (HTB) with MikroTik on the Network of Lisna Clinic YPK PLN Makassar 01," International Journal of Network and Information Technology (IJONIT), vol. 1, no. 1, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56705/ijonit.v1i1.163

[15] M. H. A. Husen and Firmansyah, "Implementation of Mikhmon Server for Qos Optimization and Traffic Control on Mikhmon Hotspot Network at Amicom Net," Mobile and Forensics, vol. 7, no. 2, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/mf.v7i2.14076

[16] Cisco Systems, Inc., "Baseline Process Best Practices White Paper," Cisco Technical Support Documentation, Doc. ID 15112, Updated Oct. 3, 2005. [Online]. Available: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/availability/high-availability/15112-HAS-baseline.html. [Accessed: Aug. 1, 2026].

Downloads

Published

2026-10-15

How to Cite

[1]
L. Nailah Azzahra and A. Ripai, “Fast Ethernet Interface Capacity Evaluation Based on Actual Contention Ratio”, JAIC, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 4732–4741, Oct. 2026.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.