Evaluation of Scalability and Resilience of Hyperledger Fabric in Blockchain Implementation for Diploma Management

Authors

  • Cahyani Pebriyanti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Galura Muhammad Suranegara Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v9i3.9262

Keywords:

Blockchain, Hyperledger Fabric, Performance, Evaluation

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the performance of a Hyperledger Fabric-based blockchain system implemented for digital diploma management. The system is tested using the Caliper benchmark tool in various network and scalability scenarios, including normal conditions (baseline), network delay of 50ms, 100ms, 200ms, and 500ms; packet loss of 1%, 5%, 10%, and 15%; bandwidth limitation of 5 Mbps; high transaction load (scalability standard and scalability optimized); and extreme conditions in the form of Byzantine attacks with malicious nodes of 10%, 30%, and 50%. The evaluation was conducted using four key metrics: transaction success rate, failure rate, average transaction latency, and throughput (TPS). The system recorded high performance under normal network conditions with a success rate of 99.8%, latency of 0.89 seconds, and throughput of 9.7 TPS. Network disruptions such as delay, packet loss, and bandwidth limitation had only a minor impact, with the success rate remaining above 99% and latency gradually increasing. High load in the scalability scenario caused latency to increase to 27.21 seconds and failure rate to rise, but improved significantly after chaincode optimization. Meanwhile, the Byzantine scenario showed a drastic drop in performance with the success rate decreasing to 12.83% and the failure rate increasing to 87.17%. These results show that the Hyperledger Fabric-based digital diploma management system is resilient to common network disruptions and reliable at medium scale, but still requires strengthening the consensus mechanism to deal with extreme conditions and maintain reliability in environments that are not fully trusted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System”.

[2] Y. Ucbas, A. Eleyan, M. Hammoudeh, dan M. Alohaly, “Performance and Scalability Analysis of Ethereum and Hyperledger Fabric,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, hlm. 67156–67167, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3291618.

[3] G. Tripathi, M. A. Ahad, dan G. Casalino, “A comprehensive review of blockchain technology: Underlying principles and historical background with future challenges,” Decis. Anal. J., vol. 9, hlm. 100344, Des 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100344.

[4] F. Anwar, B. U. I. Khan, L. B. M. Kiah, N. A. Abdullah, dan K. W. Goh, “A Comprehensive Insight into Blockchain Technology: Past Development, Present Impact and Future Considerations,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 13, no. 11, 2022, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.01311101.

[5] SS.Rajkumari, Kapa Poojitha, V.Jhansi, Chedde Meghana, S.Rajiya Banu, dan R.Ayesha Siddikha, “EDUCATIONAL CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION SYSTEM USING BLOCK CHAIN,” Int. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. Sci., vol. 8, no. 2, hlm. 165–175, 2024, doi: 10.46647/ijetms.2024.v08i02.022.

[6] A. Rustemi, F. Dalipi, V. Atanasovski, dan A. Risteski, “A Systematic Literature Review on Blockchain-Based Systems for Academic Certificate Verification,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, hlm. 64679–64696, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3289598.

[7] S. R, handra P. G., A. K., dan P. S., “Blockchain based certificate validation system,” Int. Res. J. Mod. Eng. Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 7, hlm. 3816, Jul 2022.

[8] R. Abdelmagid, M. Abdelsalam, dan F. K. Alsheref, “A Blockchain Framework for Academic Certificates Authentication,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 15, no. 7, 2024, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150729.

[9] “Southern District of Florida | Fraudulent Nursing Diploma Scheme Leads to Federal Charges Against 25 Defendants | United States Department of Justice.” Diakses: 2 Maret 2025. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdfl/pr/fraudulent-nursing-diploma-scheme-leads-federal-charges-against-25-defendants

[10] D. J. Sistyawan, R. V. Neonbeni, M. Rizal, A. C. D. C. Kusuma, dan H. Husain, “Fake Diplomas, Real Consequences: Legal and Ethical Challenges in the Legal Profession,” Constitutionale, vol. 5, no. 2, hlm. 137–156, Feb 2025, doi: 10.25041/constitutionale.v5i2.3608.

[11] M. Dabbagh, M. Sookhak, dan N. S. Safa, “The Evolution of Blockchain: A Bibliometric Study,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, hlm. 19212–19221, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2895646.

[12] A. S. Rajasekaran, M. Azees, dan F. Al-Turjman, “A comprehensive survey on blockchain technology,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., vol. 52, hlm. 102039, Agu 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2022.102039.

[13] V. Jayadev, N. Moradpoor, dan A. Petrovski, “Assessing the Performance of Ethereum and Hyperledger Fabric Under DDoS Attacks for Cyber-Physical Systems,” dalam Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, Vienna Austria: ACM, Jul 2024, hlm. 1–6. doi: 10.1145/3664476.3670927.

[14] A. El-Dorry, M. Reda, S. A. El Khalek, S. El-Din Mohamed, R. Mohamed, dan A. Nabil, “Egyptian Universities Digital Certificate Verification Model Using Blockchain,” dalam Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software and Information Engineering, dalam ICSIE ’20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Jan 2021, hlm. 79–83. doi: 10.1145/3436829.3436864.

[15] P. Dias, H. Gonçalves, F. Silva, J. Duque, J. Martins, dan A. Godinho, “Blockchain Technologies: A scrutiny into Hyperledger Fabric for Higher Educational Institutions",” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 237, hlm. 213–220, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.05.098.

[16] K. Marhane, F. Taif, dan A. Namir, “Secure Sharing of university Data Using Hyperledger Fabric and IPFS system,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 224, hlm. 163–168, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.09.024.

[17] L. Sadath, MSc, Mca, D. Mehrotra, dan A. Kumar, “Scalability Performance Analysis of Blockchain Using Hierarchical Model in Healthcare,” Blockchain Healthc. Today, vol. 7, no. 1, Apr 2024, doi: 10.30953/bhty.v7.295.

[18] C. Wickboldt, “Benchmarking a Blockchain-based Certification Storage System”.

[19] T. Guggenberger, J. Sedlmeir, G. Fridgen, dan A. Luckow, “An in-depth investigation of the performance characteristics of Hyperledger Fabric,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 173, hlm. 108716, Nov 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108716.

[20] T. Pang, Z. Ye, Z. Zhang, dan C. Jin, “Fault Tolerance Testing and Tuning for Consortium Blockchain,” Blockchain Res. Appl., hlm. 100267, Jan 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.bcra.2024.100267.

[21] A. A. Wahid, “Analisis Metode Waterfall Untuk Pengembangan Sistem Informasi,” J. Ilmu-Ilmu Inform. Dan Manaj. STMIK, 2020.

[22] A. Barger, Y. Manevich, H. Meir, dan Y. Tock, “A Byzantine Fault-Tolerant Consensus Library for Hyperledger Fabric,” 14 Juli 2021, arXiv: arXiv:2107.06922. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2107.06922.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-03

How to Cite

[1]
C. Pebriyanti and G. M. Suranegara, “Evaluation of Scalability and Resilience of Hyperledger Fabric in Blockchain Implementation for Diploma Management”, JAIC, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 571–582, Jun. 2025.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.