Comparative Analysis of ConvNeXt and EfficientNet-B0 for Early Leukemia Detection through Blood Cell Classification with Grad-CAM Interpretability

Authors

  • Made Andini Maharani Universitas Udayana
  • I Gusti Ngurah Lanang Wijayakusuma Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i3.12816

Keywords:

ConvNeXt, Deep Learning, EfficientNet-B0, Grad-CAM interpretability, Leukemia detection

Abstract

Leukemia is a hematological malignancy requiring early and accurate diagnosis for optimal patient outcomes, yet conventional microscopic examination remains subjective, time-consuming, and prone to inter-observer variability. This study presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of two state-of-the-art deep learning architectures EfficientNet-B0 and ConvNeXt-Tiny for multi-class blood cell classification aimed at early leukemia detection. Using a balanced dataset of 5,000 microscopic images encompassing five clinically significant classes (basophil, erythroblast, monocyte, myeloblast, and segmented neutrophil), both models were trained and evaluated under identical configurations with extensive data augmentation. Performance assessment encompassed classification metrics, inference speed, and interpretability through Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) validated by randomization and occlusion tests. Results demonstrated that both architectures achieved exceptional performance with F1-scores exceeding 98% (EfficientNet-B0: 0.9893, ConvNeXt: 0.9920). ConvNeXt exhibited superior accuracy in distinguishing morphologically similar cells, attributed to its larger receptive fields and advanced architectural design, while EfficientNet-B0 demonstrated dramatic computational advantages with 134 FPS throughput and a compact model size of 18.3 MB six times smaller than ConvNeXt. Grad-CAM visualizations confirmed that both models focus on clinically relevant features including nuclear morphology and cytoplasmic characteristics, validated by low correlation with randomized models (average correlation <0.28) and significantly larger confidence drops during important region occlusion (6-18× greater than random occlusion). The findings establish evidence-based guidelines for model selection, ConvNeXt for high-precision diagnostic applications and EfficientNet-B0 for large-scale screening and edge deployment. This research contributes foundational evidence toward the development of transparent, reliable, and efficient computer-aided diagnosis systems, though prospective clinical validation on multi-institutional datasets remains an important direction for future work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. Achir, I. Debbarh, N. Zoubir, I. Battas, H. Medromi, and F. Moutaouakkil, “Advances in Leukemia detection and classification: A Systematic review of AI and image processing techniques,” F1000Research, vol. 13, pp. 1–34, 2025, doi: 10.12688/f1000research.159318.2.

[2] F. Yaseen, M. Rashid, M. Y. Shabir, M. A. Khan, and N. Hussain, “Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Classification: Deep Learning Techniques for Blood Diseases Diagnosis,” J. Comput. Biomed. Informatics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2025.

[3] H. Sung et al., “Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries,” CA. Cancer J. Clin., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209–249, 2021, doi: 10.3322/caac.21660.

[4] D. A. Arber et al., “The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia,” Blood, vol. 127, no. 20, pp. 2391–2405, 2016, doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544.

[5] S. Gupta and A. Mishra, “Deep transfer learning-based classification of White Blood Cells using customized classification base,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 585–595, 2024, doi: 10.1145/3675888.3676117.

[6] R. Kim and A. Kim, “Analysis of Modern Computer Vision Models for Blood Cell Classification,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.00759, 2024.

[7] M. Tan and Q. V. Le, “EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks,” 36th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. ICML 2019, vol. 2019-June, pp. 10691–10700, 2019.

[8] Z. Liu, H. Mao, C. Y. Wu, C. Feichtenhofer, T. Darrell, and S. Xie, “A ConvNet for the 2020s,” Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., vol. 2022-June, pp. 11966–11976, 2022, doi: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01167.

[9] A. Barredo Arrieta et al., “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI,” Inf. Fusion, vol. 58, pp. 82–115, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012.

[10] E. Tjoa and C. Guan, “A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Toward Medical XAI,” IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst., vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 4793–4813, 2021, doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3027314.

[11] R. R. Selvaraju, M. Cogswell, A. Das, R. Vedantam, D. Parikh, and D. Batra, “Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., vol. 2017-Octob, pp. 618–626, 2017, doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2017.74.

[12] S. Suara, A. Jha, P. Sinha, and A. A. Sekh, “Is Grad-CAM Explainable in Medical Images?,” Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 2009 CCIS, pp. 124–135, 2024, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-58181-6_11.

[13] Y. Lecun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, “Deep learning,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7553, pp. 436–444, 2015, doi: 10.1038/nature14539.

[14] G. Litjens et al., “A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 42, no. 1995, pp. 60–88, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005.

[15] M. D. Zeiler and R. Fergus, “Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 8689 LNCS, no. PART 1, pp. 818–833, 2014, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53.

[16] F. Ahmed, N. S. Naz, S. Khan, A. U. Rehman, W. M. Ismael, and M. A. Khan, “Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in medical imaging: a systematic review of techniques, applications, and challenges,” BMC Med. Imaging, vol. 26, no. 1, 2026, doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-02118-w.

[17] M. Sandler, A. Howard, M. Zhu, A. Zhmoginov, and L. C. Chen, “MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks,” Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., pp. 4510–4520, 2018, doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474.

[18] J. Hu, L. Shen, S. Albanie, G. Sun, and E. Wu, “Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 2011–2023, 2020, doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2913372.

[19] A. Dosovitskiy et al., “an Image Is Worth 16X16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition At Scale,” ICLR 2021 - 9th Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., 2021.

[20] I. G. Asghar, S. Kumar, A. Shaukat, and P. Hynds, "Classification of white blood cells (leucocytes) from blood smear imagery using machine and deep learning models: A global scoping review," PLOS ONE, vol. 19, no. 6, e0292026, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292026.

[21] Z. Qin, F. Yu, C. Liu, and X. Chen, “How convolutional neural networks see the world --- A survey of convolutional neural network visualization methods,” Math. Found. Comput., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 149–180, 2018, doi: 10.3934/mfc.2018008.

[22] J. Adebayo, J. Gilmer, M. Muelly, I. Goodfellow, M. Hardt, and B. Kim, “Sanity checks for saliency maps,” Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 2018-Decem, no. NeurIPS, pp. 9505–9515, 2018.

[23] D. D. Gunashekar et al., “Explainable AI for CNN-based prostate tumor segmentation in multi-parametric MRI correlated to whole mount histopathology,” Radiat. Oncol., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02035-0.

[24] Tarigan, T. E., Prasetyo, A. B., & Susanti, E., "Deep Learning-Based Blood Cell Image Classification Using ResNet18 Architecture," Indonesian Journal of Data and Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 294-300, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.56705/ijodas.v6i2.300.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-14

How to Cite

[1]
M. A. Maharani and I. G. N. Lanang Wijayakusuma, “Comparative Analysis of ConvNeXt and EfficientNet-B0 for Early Leukemia Detection through Blood Cell Classification with Grad-CAM Interpretability”, JAIC, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2663–2679, Jun. 2026.

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.