Reducing Cognitive Load in Micro-School Systems through Frugal Interaction Design

Authors

  • Muhamad Akda Fathul Barri Indonesia University of Education
  • Ayu Permata Sari Indonesia University of Education
  • Suprih Widodo Indonesia University of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i3.12705

Keywords:

Cognitive Load, Frugal Computing, Interaction Design, Micro Schools, Participatory Action Research

Abstract

The rapid digitalization of education marginalizes peri-urban micro-schools, forcing them to adopt complex digital administration tools to maintain institutional legitimacy. However, conventional management systems impose excessive cognitive load on non-technical school stakeholders, leading to low adoption and persistent digital enclaves. This study aims to reduce the extraneous cognitive load of these stakeholders by designing and evaluating a serverless school administration portal based on frugal computing principles. A Targeted Participatory Action Research approach was employed with four core decision-makers at an Islamic micro-school, integrating a web interface directly with habitual messaging applications. Usability was evaluated using task completion metrics and heuristic assessments. The intervention resulted in a complete independent success rate for low-complexity tasks. Furthermore, administrative task completion times decreased dramatically from an average of forty-five seconds to fifteen seconds, with users praising the seamless integration into their daily communication routines. These findings suggest that frugal interaction design and cognitive offloading can effectively bridge the digital divide, providing a sustainable and highly usable administrative model for resource-constrained educational institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] J. Ambarita and I. Gede Eko Putra Sri Sentanu, “Digital Transformation For Inclusive Education In Rural Indonesia: Realizing Equity And Sdgs,” vol. 21, no. S3, pp. 961–981, 2024, [Online]. Available: www.migrationletters.com

[2] K. S. Kuppusamy and V. Balaji, “Evaluating web accessibility of educational institutions websites using a variable magnitude approach,” Univers. Access Inf. Soc., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 241–250, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10209-021-00812-4.

[3] W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, “The Iron Cage Redux: Looking Back and Forward,” Organization Theory, vol. 4, no. 4, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1177/26317877231221550.

[4] H. P. Lu and J. C. Wang, “Exploring the effects of sudden institutional coercive pressure on digital transformation in colleges from teachers’ perspective,” Educ. Inf. Technol. (Dordr)., vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 15991–16015, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11781-x.

[5] M. A. F. Barri, S. Widodo, and A. Permata Sari, “Digitalisasi Ekosistem Riset dan Inovasi Daerah Purwakarta: Analisis Kesiapan SDM Kolaborasi Pemerintahan,” JusiTIk, vol. 9, no. 11, 2025.

[6] K. Ouwehand, F. Lespiau, A. Tricot, and F. Paas, “Cognitive Load Theory: Emerging Trends and Innovations,” Apr. 01, 2025, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/educsci15040458.

[7] N. Meng, M. Mat Deli, and U. A. Abdul Rauf, “Educational Technology and AI: Bridging Cognitive Load and Learner Engagement for Effective Learning,” Sage Open, vol. 15, no. 4, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1177/21582440251395930.

[8] A. K. Williamson et al., “Human technology intermediation to reduce cognitive load: understanding healthcare staff members’ practices to facilitate telehealth access in a Federally Qualified Health Center patient population,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 832–845, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad257.

[9] M. Muslimin and R. Indrawati, “Digitalization and Education Equity in Remote Areas: Challenges and Strategic Solutions,” Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 376–383, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.34007/jehss.v7i2.2356.

[10] O. A. Ajani and S. Dlomo, “Enhancing School Administration in Rural South African Schools: Challenges and Opportunities-Using the Scooping Review Method,” Research in Social Sciences and Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 332–354, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.46303/ressat.2025.18.

[11] A. Masters, “Frugal Education: What, why, and how?,” Future in Educational Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 109–130, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1002/fer3.32.

[12] T. Manishimwe, D. W. P. Frazier, and H. Yusuf, “Frugal innovation and entrepreneurial university: a case study of African first development university in Africa,” Discover Education, vol. 3, no. 1, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44217-024-00299-0.

[13] E. Vasilaki and A. Mavrogianni, “Extending Cognitive Load Theory: The CLAM Framework for Biometric, Adaptive, and Ethical Learning,” Psychology International, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 40, May 2025, doi: 10.3390/psycholint7020040.

[14] K. Jordan, “How can messaging apps, WhatsApp and SMS be used to support learning? A scoping review,” Technology, Pedagogy and Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 275–288, 2023, doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2023.2201590.

[15] N. Neiroukh et al., “Organizational communication competence of public secondary school principals through utilizing WhatsApp,” Front. Educ. (Lausanne)., vol. 9, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1374279.

[16] D. Cockerham, “Participatory action research: building understanding, dialogue, and positive actions in a changing digital environment,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 2763–2791, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11423-023-10294-1.

[17] C. Emi, S. Sardin, J. R. Pramudia, C. Sukmana, and F. Ferianti, “The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational & Social Sciences (EPESS) The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational Educational Technology in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Literature Review,” & Social Sciences (EPESS), vol. 35, 2024, [Online]. Available: www.isres.org

[18] J. Lu, M. Schmidt, M. Lee, and R. Huang, “Usability research in educational technology: a state-of-the-art systematic review,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1951–1992, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11423-022-10152-6.

[19] Harrison Oke Ekpobimi, “Building high-performance web applications with NextJS,” Computer Science & IT Research Journal, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1963–1977, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.51594/csitrj.v5i8.1459.

[20] Vaibhav Vudayagiri, “Demystifying Serverless Architecture for Scalable Web Applications,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 254–263, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.32628/cseit24106176.

[21] Arun Kumar Akuthota, “Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) in Modern Cloud Security Governance: An In-depth Analysis,” International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 3297–3311, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.32628/cseit25112793.

[22] P. Vlachogianni and N. Tselios, “Perceived Usability Evaluation of Educational Technology Using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ): A Systematic Review,” Sep. 01, 2023, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi: 10.3390/su151712954.

[23] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG),” Palliat. Med., vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 608–616, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1177/02692163241234800.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

[1]
M. A. F. Barri, A. P. Sari, and S. Widodo, “Reducing Cognitive Load in Micro-School Systems through Frugal Interaction Design”, JAIC, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2305–2312, Jun. 2026.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.