Spatiotemporal Analysis of Peatland Fire Hotspots and Fire Intensity in Riau Province Using MODIS–VIIRS Multisensor Satellite Data

Authors

  • Najwa Ratu Afi Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
  • Ramadhan Rakhmat Sani Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
  • Ricardus Anggi Pramunendar Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
  • Nurul Anisa Sri Winarsih Universitas Dian Nuswantoro
  • Ika Novita Dewi Universitas Dian Nuswantoro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i3.12686

Keywords:

Peatland fire hotspots, Spatiotemporal analysis, MODIS–VIIRS multisensor data, Remote sensing, Fire monitoring

Abstract

Peatland fires in Riau Province frequently occur during the dry season and contribute significantly to regional haze, environmental degradation and carbon emissions. Effective monitoring of these fires remains challenging due to their widespread distribution and varying intensity across peatland areas. This research aims to analyze the spatiotemporal characteristics of peatland fire hotspots in Riau Province using multisensor satellite observations from the NASA Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS). The dataset integrates Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) data from the Suomi-NPP, NOAA-20 and NOAA-21 satellites. After applying filtering criteria of confidence ≥70% and Fire Radiative Power (FRP) ≥5 megawatts (MW), a total of 7,297 significant hotspots were identified during the July–October 2025 dry season. The results show that fire activity peaked in July with a maximum daily FRP of 25,611 MW and a monthly total of 65,120 MW, followed by a decline in September and a slight increase in October. The FRP distribution was highly right-skewed, with an average value of
13.2 MW, while the most intense hotspots reached 189.4 MW. Estimated carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions reached approximately 122,472 tons, indicating substantial environmental impacts. Spatial clustering and persistence analysis revealed several high-risk peatland zones with repeated fire occurrences. These findings demonstrate the importance of multisensor satellite monitoring for improving early fire detection, emission assessment and disaster mitigation strategies in peatland regions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] H. Krisnawati et al., “Building capacity for estimating fire emissions from tropical peatlands; a worked example from Indonesia,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, no. 1, p. 14355, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40894-z.

[2] H. Hayasaka, “Peatland Fire Weather Conditions in Sumatra, Indonesia,” Climate, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 92, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/cli11050092.

[3] M. J. Wooster et al., “Satellite remote sensing of active fires: History and current status, applications and future requirements,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 267, p. 112694, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112694.

[4] L. Kiely et al., “Assessing costs of Indonesian fires and the benefits of restoring peatland,” Nat. Commun., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 7044, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27353-x.

[5] M. Parrington et al., “Biomass burning emission estimation in the MODIS era: State-of-the-art and future directions,” Elem Sci Anth, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 00089, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1525/elementa.2024.00089.

[6] X. Lu, X. Zhang, F. Li, and M. A. Cochrane, “Improved estimation of fire particulate emissions using a combination of VIIRS and AHI data for Indonesia during 2015–2020,” Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 281, p. 113238, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113238.

[7] C. B. Engel, S. D. Jones, and K. J. Reinke, “Fire Radiative Power (FRP) Values for Biogeographical Region and Individual Geostationary HHMMSS Threshold (BRIGHT) Hotspots Derived from the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI),” Remote Sens., vol. 14, no. 11, p. 2540, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/rs14112540.

[8] D. A. Tinoco-Orozco et al., “Where Do Fires Burn More Intensely? Modeling and Mapping Maximum MODIS Fire Radiative Power from Aboveground Biomass by Fuel Type in Mexico,” Fire, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 54, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/fire8020054.

[9] M. Ohashi et al., “Correlation of publication frequency of newspaper articles with environment and public health issues in fire-prone peatland regions of Riau in Sumatra, Indonesia,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 307, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1057/s41599-021-00994-5.

[10] V. S. A. Hendrawan, A. P. Rahardjo, H. G. Mawandha, E. Aldrian, A. Muhari, and D. Komori, “Review article: Past and future

climate–related hazards in Indonesia,” Jun. 10, 2025, Atmospheric, Meteorological and Climatological Hazards. doi: 10.5194/egusphere-2025-584.

[11] E. Wulandari, D. Mardiatno, D. H. Susilastuti, and A. Maryudi, “Scholarly Interest in Forest Fires in Indonesia: A Bibliographical Review,” For. Soc., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 609–619, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.24259/fs.v6i2.21473.

[12] Y. Vetrita et al., “Monthly mapping of Indonesia’s burned areas: implementation, history, techniques, and future directions,” Int. J. Remote Sens., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 636–660, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1080/01431161.2024.2421942.

[13] D. A. Shofiana and I. S. Sitanggang, “Confidence Analysis of Hotspot as Peat Forest Fire Indicator,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1751, p. 012035, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1751/1/012035.

[14] G. McAvoy and K. Vadrevu, “Spatiotemporal Analysis of Vegetation Fires and Carbon Monoxide Pollution in Indonesia,” Remote Sens., vol. 17, no. 19, p. 3275, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.3390/rs17193275.

[15] A. M. Graham et al., “Updated Smoke Exposure Estimate for Indonesian Peatland Fires Using a Network of Low‐Cost PM2.5 Sensors and a Regional Air Quality Model,” GeoHealth, vol. 8, no. 11, p. e2024GH001125, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1029/2024GH001125.

[16] H. Purnomo et al., “Community-based fire prevention and peatland restoration in Indonesia: A participatory action research approach,” Environ. Dev., vol. 50, p. 100971, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2024.100971.

[17] M. J. Grosvenor et al., “Catastrophic impact of extreme 2019 Indonesian peatland fires on urban air quality and health,” Commun. Earth Environ., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 649, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s43247-024-01813-w.

[18] D. Fisher, M. J. Wooster, W. Xu, G. Thomas, and P. Lestari, “Top-Down Estimation of Particulate Matter Emissions from Extreme Tropical Peatland Fires Using Geostationary Satellite Fire Radiative Power Observations,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 24, p. 7075, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20247075.

[19] M. J. Grosvenor et al., “Catastrophic impact of extreme 2019 Indonesian peatland fires on urban air quality and health,” Commun. Earth Environ., vol. 5, no. 1, p. 649, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s43247-024-01813-w.

[20] A. Usup and H. Hayasaka, “Peatland Fire Weather Conditions in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia,” Fire, vol. 6, no. 5, p. 182, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3390/fire6050182.

[21] R. Carmenta, A. Zabala, B. Trihadmojo, D. Gaveau, M. A. Salim, and

J. Phelps, “Evaluating bundles of interventions to prevent peat-fires in Indonesia,” Glob. Environ. Change, vol. 67, p. 102154, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102154.

[22] S.-M. Jalilov, Y. Rochmayanto, D. C. Hidayat, J. T. Raharjo, D. Mendham, and J. D. Langston, “Unveiling economic dimensions of peatland restoration in Indonesia: A systematic literature review,” Ecosyst. Serv., vol. 71, p. 101693, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101693.

[23] S. Sloan, L. Tacconi, and M. E. Cattau, “Fire prevention in managed landscapes: Recent success and challenges in Indonesia,” Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change, vol. 26, no. 7, p. 32, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11027-021-09965-2.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-08

How to Cite

[1]
N. Ratu Afi, R. R. Sani, R. A. Pramunendar, N. A. S. Winarsih, and I. N. Dewi, “Spatiotemporal Analysis of Peatland Fire Hotspots and Fire Intensity in Riau Province Using MODIS–VIIRS Multisensor Satellite Data”, JAIC, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2198–2208, Jun. 2026.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.