Analisis Perbandingan Efektifitas Metode Marker dan Markerless Tracking pada Objek Augmented Reality

  • Budi Arifitama universitas trilogi
  • Ade Syahputra Universitas Trilogi
  • Ketut Bayu Yogha Bintoro Universitas Trilogi
Keywords: Augmented Reality Marker effectiveness, Marker-based Tracking Test, Markerless-based tracking Testing, Augmented Reality


Markers in augmented reality is an important component for the emergence of an augmented reality object. The function of the marker is to mark the location of an augmented reality object. Currently, there are two types of markers used in the development of augmented reality, namely marker-based tracking and markerless-based tracking. Marker-based tracking has a marker with a pattern on a printed media. Meanwhile, Markerless-based tracking has a point distribution pattern based on a flat surface. Unfortunately, several previous studies that developed AR applications did not have information on the effectiveness and accuracy between the two methods. It is very important to measure the accuracy of the appearance of AR objects to determine the appearance of AR objects, failing to choose the marker used will cause instability in the appearance of AR objects. This study tested the two markers which is distance, height and angle as a parameter. The results of the test stated that markerless tracking was superior to distances of 150 cm with an accuracy rate of 93% while marker-based tracking was only 83.3%.


Download data is not yet available.


H. Pradibta, “Augmented reality: Daily prayers for preschooler student,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., 2018, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v12i1.7269.

G. D, O. Kumar, and S. Ram, “Marker Based Augmented Reality Application in Education: Teaching and Learning,” Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 2016.

A. J. Moreno-Guerrero, A. M. Rodríguez García, M. R. Navas-Parejo, and C. R. Jiménez, “Digital literacy and the use of augmented reality in teaching science in Secondary Education,” Rev. Fuentes, 2021, doi: 10.12795/REVISTAFUENTES.2021.V23.I1.12050.

E. Demitriadou, K. E. Stavroulia, and A. Lanitis, “Comparative evaluation of virtual and augmented reality for teaching mathematics in primary education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-09973-5.

J. Paulo Lima et al., “Markerless tracking system for augmented reality in the automotive industry,” Expert Syst. Appl., 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.060.

M. S. A. El-Seoud and I. A. T. F. Taj-Eddin, “An android augmented reality application for retail fashion shopping,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., 2019, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v13i01.9898.

D. E. Kurniawan, A. Dzikri, M. Suriya, Y. Rokhayati, and A. Najmurrokhman, “Object Visualization Using Maps Marker Based On Augmented Reality,” 2018. doi: 10.1109/INCAE.2018.8579411.

A. Gherghina, A. C. Olteanu, and N. Tapus, “A marker-based augmented reality system for mobile devices,” 2013. doi: 10.1109/RoEduNet.2013.6511731.

I. W. A. Indrawan, I. P. Agung Bayupati, and D. P. S. Putri, “Markerless augmented reality utilizing Gyroscope to Demonstrate the Position of Dewata Nawa Sanga,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., 2018, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v12i1.7527.

A. Lee, J. Y. Lee, S. H. Lee, and J. S. Choi, “Markerless augmented reality system based on planar object tracking,” 2011. doi: 10.1109/FCV.2011.5739718.

W. Ramadhan, B. Arifitama, and S. D. H. Permana, “Mobile augmented reality for furniture visualization using Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM),” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1098/6/062008.


Most read articles by the same author(s)