Innovative Mobile Application UI/UX for Gestari Waste Bank Administration Using Activity-Centered Design

Authors

  • Dhea Intan Charisma Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
  • Riza Prapascatama Agusdin Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v9i5.9913

Keywords:

Activity-Centered Design, User Interface, Waste Bank, Usability Testing, User Experience

Abstract

Bank Sampah Gestari, located in Dusun Gesikan, Panggungharjo, Sewon, Bantul, runs a routine household waste sorting program every “Minggu Legi.” In its operation, administrative officers still rely on manual data recording using notes and books, leading to data accumulation and inefficient recap processes, especially with the growing number of customers. The absence of a digital system to support the recording process presents a major challenge in achieving optimal administration. This study aims to design the User Interface (UI) and User Experience (UX) of a mobile-based administrative system for Bank Sampah Gestari using the Activity Centered Design approach. The approach focuses on the core activities performed by users during administrative tasks. The design process was informed by observations and interviews with administrative staff and was used to develop application flows and interfaces aligned with user needs and the bank’s business processes. The prototype was evaluated through two usability testing iterations, measuring five usability aspects: learnability, efficiency, memorability, errors, and satisfaction. Results showed notable improvements in all aspects. Learnability increased from 78% to 94%, efficiency from 0.0155 to 0.0440 goals/sec, memorability from 2.75 to 3.85, error rate decreased from 0.44 to 0.12, and satisfaction rose from 25.5 to 84.5. In conclusion, the proposed interface design significantly enhances ease of use, operational efficiency, and user satisfaction. The design can serve as a recommendation for developing a more structured, effective, and user-friendly digital administrative system for Bank Sampah Gestari.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. B. Santoso, S. Margowati, U. Pujiyanti, P. E. Pudyawati, and S. Prihatiningtyas, Pengelolaan Sampah Anorganik Sebagai Upaya Pemberdayaan Nasabah Bank Sampah, vol. 6, no. 1. 2021.

[2] Y. Febriyanto, P. Sukmasetya, and M. Maimunah, “Implementasi Design Thinking dalam Perancangan UI/UX Rumah Sampah Digital Banjarejo,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 936–947, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josh.v4i3.3135.

[3] J. Beno, A. . Silen, and M. Yanti, “Pedang Sampah: Kegiatan Pemilahan Daur Ulang dan Pembentukan Sistem Bank Sampah di Lingkungan Desa Doroampel, Tulungagung,” Braz Dent J., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022.

[4] M. Dipa Maulana, M. Defriani, and M. R. Muttaqin, “Perancangan Ui / Ux Aplikasi Penjualan Alat Bulu Tangkis Berbasis Mobile Menggunakan Metode Activity Centered Design (ACD),” J. Ris. Sist. Inf. dan Tek. Inform., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 51–61, 2024.

[5] J. Ruiz, E. Serral, and M. Snoeck, “Unifying Functional User Interface Design Principles,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 47–67, 2021, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1805876.

[6] I. G. S. Rahayuda and N. P. L. Santiari, “User Interface Evaluation of Disaster Iformation System Using Mandel ’ S Golden Rules,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 579–586, 2021, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.202184389.

[7] S. A. Rahman, Perancangan Tampilan Antarmuka Pada Situs Repository Uin Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Menggunakan Metode Activity Centered Design. 2022.

[8] R. Hidayah and M. Idris, “Perancangan User Interface Mobile Aplikasi Job Orderapp Pt. Dinamika Mediakom Menggunakan Metode Activity Centered Design Dengan Pendedkatan Teori Gestalt,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2023.

[9] M. F. Azi, C. Wiguna, and K. N. Meiah, “Analisis User Interfaces Pada Website Kampiun ITTP Dengan Metode Heuristik dan System Usability Scale (SUS),” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 1080, 2022, doi: 10.30865/mib.v6i2.3802.

[10] C. Mariage, J. Vanderdonckt, and C. Pribeanu, “State of the Art of Web Usability Guidelines,” Handb. Hum. Factors Web Des., no. June 2006, pp. 688–700, 1999, doi: 10.1.1.58.4494.

[11] M. A. Muhyidin, M. A. Sulhan, and A. Sevtiana, “Perancangan Ui/Ux Aplikasi My Cic Layanan Informasi Akademik Mahasiswa Menggunakan Aplikasi Figma,” J. Digit, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 208, 2020, doi: 10.51920/jd.v10i2.171.

[12] A. Nurkhotimah, “Evaluasi Dan Perbaikan Desain User Interface Pada Aplikas Btn Mobile Dengan Metode User Centered Design,” 2023.

[13] D. Rianto Rahadi, “Pengukuran Usability Sistem Menggunakan Use Questionnaire Pada Aplikasi Android,” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 661–671, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jsi/index

[14] A. D. Listikowati, I. Aknuranda, and A. R. Perdanakusuma, “Evaluasi Usability Situs Web Sistem Informasi Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (SIPPD) v3.0 menggunakan Metode Usability Testing (Studi Kasus : Bappelitbangda Kota Batu),” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 4777–4786, 2019.

[15] M. S. Tuloli, R. Patalangi, and R. Takdir, “Pengukuran Tingkat Usability Sistem Aplikasi e-Rapor Menggunakan Metode Usability Testing dan SUS,” Jambura J. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 13–26, 2022, doi: 10.37905/jji.v4i1.13411.

[16] W. Handiwidjojo and L. Ernawati, “Pengukuran Tingkat Ketergunaan ( Usability ) Sistem Informasi Keuangan,” Juisi, vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 49–55, 2016.

[17] S. Supriyono and N. D. F. Ardillah, “Implementasi Metode Usability Testing pada Pengukuran Kualitas Perangkat Lunak Website Kelurahan Dinoyo,” Ilk. J. Comput. Sci. Appl. Informatics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 139–148, 2023, doi: 10.28926/ilkomnika.v5i3.566.

[18] N. I. for S. and T. (NIST), “Common Industry Format for Usability Test, Version 2.0,” Word J. Int. Linguist. Assoc., 2001.

[19] D. W. Ramadhan, “Pengujian Usability Website Time Excelindo Menggunakan System Usability Scale (Sus) (Studi Kasus: Website Time Excelindo),” JIPI (Jurnal Ilm. Penelit. dan Pembelajaran Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, p. 139, 2019, doi: 10.29100/jipi.v4i2.977.

[20] A. Bangor, P. Kortum, and J. Miller, “Determining what individual SUS scores mean; adding an adjective rating,” J. usability Stud., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 114–23, 2009.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-14

How to Cite

[1]
D. I. Charisma and R. P. Agusdin, “Innovative Mobile Application UI/UX for Gestari Waste Bank Administration Using Activity-Centered Design”, JAIC, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 2672–2686, Oct. 2025.

Similar Articles

<< < 25 26 27 28 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.