Use Case Framework of Computerized Production Monitoring Processes in Textile Industry
Abstract
Use cases are a description of system functions resulting from needs analysis and obtained from interviews and observations. In standard practices, this stage is also known as the most time-consuming stage. Although every use case produced in software development is unique, there is always a similarity in its function to systems made previously in other organizations. These similarities are studied to reduce time in the process during the requirements analysis stage. Many studies have built and used a Use Case Framework (UCF) to be used together by software developers. So far, UCF has been owned by the banking industry in mapping use case standards in ATMs, health in standardizing use cases in electronic medical records, libraries in standardizing information retrieval, and mapping processes in crowdfunding. This research adds to the list of the latest UCFs produced, namely in the related textile industry, in standardizing the functions that exist in computer-based production monitoring systems. It is based on the fact that there are many textile companies globally, with more than 1.000 of them are established in Indonesia. This study investigated eight Indonesian textile companies to obtain information data to determine what functions are required, t. The data collection techniques used were interviews and observation. More stages were carried out in this study afterward, namely defining Actor Analysis and Functional Methods, Combining Analysis, Classification of Use Cases, Describing Use Case Scenarios, and Visualizing Frameworks. The data analysis results obtained from each company, we managed to define 10 main use cases, 4 supporting use cases, and four specific use cases. This study’s products can help provide a reference in using case design to create a computer-based textile company monitoring system.
Downloads
References
N. Arifin and Jaja, “Production Process Monitoring Information System Design at PT. Charoen Pokphand Indonesia,” J. Glob., vol. V, no. 1, pp. 39–49, 2018.
L. Y. Chan, M. Xie, and T. N. Goh, “Cumulative quantity control charts for monitoring production processes,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 397–408, 2000.
M. N. Daud, “Analisis Pengendalian Persediaan Bahan Baku Produksi Roti Wilton Kualasimpang,” J. Samudra Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 760–774, 2017.
A. Snatkin, K. Karjust, and T. Eiskop, “Real time production monitoring system in SME,” Proc. Int. Conf. DAAAM Balt. , pp. 573–578, 2012.
I. A. C. Cahyani, I. M. Pulawan, and N. M. Santini, “Analysis of Raw Material Inventories for the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Raw Material Inventory Costs on the Smoothness of the Production Process at Murnisingaraja Tempe Industry in Badung Regency,” WACANA Ekon. (Jurnal Ekon. Bisnis dan Akuntansi), vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 116–125, 2019.
A. Herliana and P. M. Rasyid, “Software Development Monitoring Information System In Stage,” J. Inform., no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2016.
H. Hery, P. Endi, and N. R. U. Niel, “Production Process Monitoring System on Bardi Machines at PT. Tirta Investama (Danone Aqua) Sukabumi Web Based,” Setrum, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 26–34, 2014.
A. Shamsuzzoha, F. Ferreira, A. Azevedo, and P. Helo, “Collaborative smart process monitoring within virtual factory environment: an implementation issue,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 167–181, 2017.
R. Iannone, A. Ingenito, G. Martino, S. Miranda, C. Pepe, and S. Riemma, “Merchandise and replenishment planning optimisation for fashion retail,” Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag., vol. 5, no. SPL.ISSUE, pp. 1–14, 2013.
R. M. Locke, F. Qin, and A. Brause, “Does monitoring improve labor standards? Lessons from Nike,” Ind. Labor Relations Rev., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 3–31, 2007.
P. Kung, C. Hagen, M. Rodel, and S. Seifert, “Business Process Monitoring & Measurement in a Large Bank: Challenges and Selected Approaches,” 2005, vol. 2006, pp. 955–961.
B. Staats, H. Dai, D. Hofmann, and K. Milkman, “Motivating Process Compliance Through Individual Electronic Monitoring: An Empirical Examination of Hand Hygiene in Healthcare,” Manage. Sci., vol. 63, 2016.
C. Rosen, U. Jeppsson, and P. Vanrolleghem, “Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 50, pp. 41–49, 2004.
H. H. RACHMAT and H. ASRIL, “Implementation of Counter Production Monitoring on Microcontroller-based Textile Machines,” ELKOMIKA J. Tek. Energi Elektr. Tek. Telekomun. Tek. Elektron., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 115, 2014.
L. A. Hakim and R. A. Anugraha, “Designing Process Automation System for Jacquard Textile Card Hole Punching Machine At Pt. Buana Intan Gemilang Automation System Design Punching Process for Jacquard Textile Card on Punching Machine At Pt. Buana Intan Gemilang,” vol. 4, pp. 68–75, 2017.
M. P. de Brito, V. Carbone, and C. M. Blanquart, “Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: Organisation and performance,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 534–553, 2008.
D. Turker and C. Altuntas, “Sustainable supply chain management in the fast fashion industry: An analysis of corporate reports,” Eur. Manag. J., vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 837–849, 2014.
D. Pandey, U. Suman, and A. K. Ramani, “An Effective Requirement Engineering Process Model for Software Development and Requirements Management,” 2010, pp. 287–291.
H. Xie, J. Yang, C. K. Chang, and L. Liu, “A statistical analysis approach to predict user’s changing requirements for software service evolution,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 132, pp. 147–164, 2017.
T. Nakatani, T. Urai, S. Ohmura, and T. Tamai, “A requirements description metamodel for use cases,” 2002, pp. 251–258.
R. J. Wirfs-Brock, “Designing scenarios: Making the case for a use case framework,” Smalltalk Rep., vol. 3, no. 3, 1993.
J. Zhang and M. F. Walji, “TURF: Toward a unified framework of EHR usability,” J. Biomed. Inform., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1056–1067, 2011.
P. Hansen, A. Järvelin, G. Eriksson, and J. Karlgren, “A Use Case Framework for Information Access Evaluation,” in Professional Search in the Modern World : COST Action IC1002 on Multilingual and Multifaceted Interactive Information Access, no. 8330, 2014, pp. 6–22.
W.-C. Hu and H. Jiau, “UCFrame: A Use Case Framework for Crowd-Centric Requirement Acquisition,” ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, vol. 41, pp. 1–13, 2016.
D. Nurmadewi and M. ER, “Analyzing Linkage Between Business Process Management (BPM) Capability and Information Technology: A Case Study in Garment SMEs,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 161, pp. 935–942, 2019.
V. Mantzana, M. Themistocleous, Z. Irani, and V. Morabito, “Identifying healthcare actors involved in the adoption of information systems,” Eur. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 16, pp. 91–102, 2007.
R. Trisdiyanti, F. Renaldi, F. R. Umbara, and A. T. Bon, “Implementation of production monitoring systems in a small textile company,” Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manag., no. August, pp. 2980–2987, 2020.
H. A. Rohman, F. Renaldi, F. R. Umbara, and A. T. Bon, “Production monitoring information system: Managing supply and demand in the textile factory,” Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manag., no. August, pp. 1902–1911, 2020.
Copyright (c) 2022 Irma Santikarama, Faiza Renaldi, Fatan Kasyidi, Agya Java Maulidin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) ) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
