Classification of Brain Tumors Using a Hybrid VGG16-ResNet50 Architecture with SVM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i2.12309Keywords:
Brain Tumor Classification, MRI, Convolutional Neural Networks, VGG16, ResNet50, Support Vector MachineAbstract
Brain tumor classification from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is critical for clinical diagnosis and treatment planning. This study proposes a hybrid deep learning architecture combining VGG16 and ResNet50 convolutional neural networks, utilized strictly as fixed feature extractors via transfer learning, followed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction and Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification. Unlike approaches that train CNNs from scratch, we leverage pre-trained ImageNet weights to extract high-level feature representations without fine-tuning the convolutional layers. The methodology was evaluated on a dataset of 3,064 T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI images categorized into three tumor classes: Meningioma, Glioma, and Pituitary tumors. Three experimental configurations with distinct train-test ratios (80:20, 70:30, and 60:40) were investigated using strict patient-level splitting to prevent data leakage, achieving 90.36% accuracy (80:20 split) with 0.9564 specificity. To rigorously validate clinical generalization, a 5-fold cross-validation was subsequently performed, yielding 85.90% accuracy. The consistent high specificity (>0.91) across all configurations indicates reliable clinical applicability. The fused feature representation, combined with PCA compression to approximately 290 components and SVM margin maximization, produced a computationally efficient and interpretable model suitable for deployment in resource-constrained clinical environments. Results demonstrate that architectural fusion of complementary deep learning features with classical machine learning classifiers achieves competitive performance with enhanced generalization and data efficiency compared to single-model approaches. The novelty of this study lies in the empirical validation of a "frozen-fusion" strategy that eliminates the need for expensive backpropagation during training while outperforming standard transfer learning baselines, specifically determining the optimal PCA-SVM configuration for maximizing specificity in pituitary tumor diagnosis within resource-constrained environments.
Downloads
References
[1] F. J. Dorfner, J. B. Patel, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, E. R. Gerstner, and C. P. Bridge, “A review of deep learning for brain tumor analysis in MRI,” Npj Precis. Oncol., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00789-2.
[2] Md. Nahiduzzaman et al., “A hybrid explainable model based on advanced machine learning and deep learning models for classifying brain tumors using MRI images,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 1649, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85874-7.
[3] A. Oh et al., “Machine learning approach to brain tumor detection and classification,” Nov. 06, 2024, arXiv: arXiv:2410.12692. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.12692.
[4] S. M. Rasa et al., “Brain tumor classification using fine-tuned transfer learning models on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images,” Digit. Health, vol. 10, p. 20552076241286140, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1177/20552076241286140.
[5] D. Husen, “Klasifikasi Citra MRI Tumor Otak Menggunakan Metode Convolutional Neural Network,” Bit-Tech, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 143–152, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.32877/bt.v7i1.1576.
[6] H. Riaqi and I. Tahyudin, “Comparative Analysis of VGG16 and ResNet50 Model Performence in Cardiac ECG Image Classification,” vol. 9, no. 3.
[7] N. A. Husna, D. Hendri, M. F. Wajdi, E. S. Ginting, and C. H. Pramesthi, “Implementation of Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Classification from Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” Public Res. J. Eng. Data Technol. Comput. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31–41, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.57152/predatecs.v3i1.1570.
[8] Y. Kumaran S, J. J. Jeya, M. T. R, S. B. Khan, S. Alzahrani, and M. Alojail, “Explainable lung cancer classification with ensemble transfer learning of VGG16, Resnet50 and InceptionV3 using grad-cam,” BMC Med. Imaging, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 176, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01345-x.
[9] Vicky and Ronsen Purba, “Optimizing Brain Tumor Classification with Freeze-5 VGG16 and Dataset Fusion,” J. Nov. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 4, no. 02, pp. 63–70, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.56741/jnest.v4i02.999.
[10] S. Yoon, “Brain tumor classification using a hybrid ensemble of Xception and parallel deep CNN models,” Inform. Med. Unlocked, vol. 54, p. 101629, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2025.101629.
[11] D. Boubdellaha, R. Mokni, and B. Ammar, “Brain Tumor Classification with Hybrid Deep Learning Models from MRI Images,” 2025.
[12] U. K. Agrawal, N. Panda, B. V. Ramana, D. Singh, and A. K. Dalai, “DiagPCNN: Enhancing CNN through Pretrained Model for Brain Tumor Diagnosis,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 258, pp. 2334–2342, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2025.04.496.
[13] E. M. Younis, I. A. Ibrahim, M. N. Mahmoud, and A. M. Albarrak, “Hybrid of VGG-16 and FTVT-b16 Models to Enhance Brain Tumors Classification Using MRI Images,” Diagnostics, vol. 15, no. 16, p. 2014, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15162014.
[14] H. ZainEldin et al., “Brain Tumor Detection and Classification Using Deep Learning and Sine-Cosine Fitness Grey Wolf Optimization,” Bioengineering, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 18, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010018.
[15] T. S. Nabila and A. Salam, “Classification of Brain Tumors by Using a Hybrid CNN-SVM Model,” J. Appl. Inform. Comput., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 241–247, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.30871/jaic.v8i2.8277.
[16] J. Cheng, “brain tumor dataset.” figshare, p. 879509079 Bytes, 2017. doi: 10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.1512427.V5.
[17] J. Cheng et al., “Enhanced Performance of Brain Tumor Classification via Tumor Region Augmentation and Partition,” PLOS ONE, vol. 10, no. 10, p. e0140381, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140381.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mohammad Aviscena Zaidan, L. Budi Handoko, Abdussalam Abdussalam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) ) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).








