Unveiling the Blockchain Intention-Behavior Gap Among Young Developers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i1.11702Keywords:
Blockchain Technology, Developer Adoption, Intention-Behavior Gap, PLS-SEM, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)Abstract
This study assesses the factors influencing blockchain technology acceptance among young developers in Batam, Indonesia, with a specific focus on comparing two distinct behaviors: using blockchain-based applications and engaging in blockchain development. Data were collected through a survey of 215 young developers and analyzed using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The main outcomes reveal two fundamentally different adoption pathways. The intention to use blockchain applications is primarily driven by personal engagement and social influence, reflecting a "hype-driven" interest, and this intention strongly translates into actual usage behavior. Conversely, the model demonstrates a complete failure to explain development behavior, revealing a significant intention-behavior gap where the intention to develop shows no significant effect on actual development activities. The study concludes that for this demographic, hype-driven interest is sufficient for superficial application adoption but wholly inadequate for fostering development capabilities. Substantive adoption requires more than social trends; therefore, industry and educational focus should shift from promoting hype to enhancing technical literacy and demonstrating tangible use cases to bridge the gap from interest to competence.
Downloads
References
[1] S. Wong, J. K. W. Yeung, Y.-Y. Lau, T. Kawasaki, dan R. Kwong, “A Critical Literature Review on Blockchain Technology Adoption in Supply Chains,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 5174, 2024, doi: doi.org/10.3390/su16125174.
[2] S. S. Saheb, V. K. R. Chinnapareddy, D. Devalla, S. Charugulla, N. B. Chakka, dan K. R. Sekhar, “Factors Leading to the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Financial Reporting,” Front. Blockchain, vol. 8, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2025.1491609.
[3] R. Falih, S. Abdullah, Y. Y. Jusoh, R. Abdullah, N. C. PA, dan D. J. Kadhim, “Exploring Key Factors Influencing Blockchain Adoption in E-Government: Pilot Study,” JOIV Int. J. Informatics Vis., vol. 8, no. 3–2, hal. 1883–1891, 2024, doi: 10.62527/joiv.8.3-2.878.
[4] U. W. E. Saputra dan G. S. Darma, “The Intention to Use Blockchain in Indonesia Using Extended Approach Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” CommIT J., vol. 16, no. 1, hal. 27–35, 2022, doi: 10.21512/commit.v16i1.7609.
[5] H. M. Al-Hattami, “What Factors Influence the Intention to Adopt Blockchain Technology in Accounting Education?,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 11, no. 787, 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03315-8.
[6] T. Wibowo dan Y. Christian, “Usage of Blockchain to Ensure Audit Data Integrity,” EQUITY, vol. 24, no. 1, hal. 47–58, 2021, doi: 10.34209/equ.v24i1.2357.
[7] T. Stojanović, S. D. Lazarević, M. Radenković, T. Naumović, dan A. Miletić, “Assessing the Adoption and Utilization of Blockchain Technology Among Software Developers,” Facta Univ., vol. 37, no. 1, hal. 75–91, 2024, doi: 10.2298/FUEE2401075S.
[8] C. Bernardino, F. Cesário, C. J. Costa, M. Aparicio, dan J. T. Aparicio, “Blockchain Adoption Factors,” Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. Manag., vol. 13, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.12821/ijispm130103.
[9] T. Norbu, J. Y. Park, K. W. Wong, dan H. Cui, “Factors Affecting Trust and Acceptance for Blockchain Adoption in Digital Payment Systems: A Systematic Review,” Futur. Internet, vol. 16, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.3390/fi16030106.
[10] B. O. Boateng, C. Asare, K. N. Sekyere, D. N. Akude, dan B. H. Walden, “Understanding Blockchain Adoption In Emerging Markets: Integrating The Technology Acceptance Model And Innovation Diffusion Theory,” Int. J. Entrep., vol. 27, no. 5, hal. 1–23, 2023.
[11] H. Saed, Y. S. Manzli, A. Jeribi, dan H. Alnafisah, “Analyzing Blockchain Adoption in Management Operations through an Extended UTAUT Model in the Libyan Context,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 31107, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12608-0.
[12] A. Ruangkanjanases, E. M. A. Qhal, K. M. Alfawaz, dan T. Hariguna, “Examining the Antecedents of Blockchain Usage Intention: An Integrated Research Framework,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, hal. 3500, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15043500.
[13] W. K. Tse, X. Dai, Y. M. Lee, dan D. Lu, “User Acceptance of Blockchain Technology in Financial Applications: Information Security, Technology Awareness and Privacy Aspects,” Blockchains, vol. 2, no. 3, hal. 299–311, 2024, doi: 10.3390/blockchains2030014.
[14] I. S. Latif, R. E. Saputro, dan A. S. Barkah, “Technology Acceptance Model TAM using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling PLS- SEM: A Systematic Literature Review,” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, vol. 7, no. 2, hal. 1–25, 2025, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v7i2.1104.
[15] H. Sama, T. Wibowo, dan Tukino, “Analysis of the Use of Distance Learning Technology in Universities in the Riau Islands Province with the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 9, no. 12, hal. 11070–11077, 2023, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5836.
[16] A. AL-Ashmori, G. Thangarasu, P. D. D. Dominic, dan A.-B. A. Al-Mekhlafi, “A Readiness Model and Factors Influencing Blockchain Adoption in Malaysia’s Software Sector: A Survey Study,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 16, hal. 12139, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151612139.
[17] A. AL-Ashmori, P. D. D. Dominic, dan N. S. S. Singh, “Items and Constructs of Blockchain Adoption in Software Development Industry: Experts Perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 16, hal. 10406, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su141610406.
[18] Z. Z. Li, H. Wang, D. Gasevic, J. Yu, dan J. K. Liu, “Enhancing Blockchain Adoption through Tailored Software Engineering: An Industrial-grounded Study in Education Credentialing,” Distrib. Ledger Technol. Res. Pract., vol. 2, no. 4, hal. 1–24, 2023, doi: 10.1145/363253.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Suwarno Suwarno, Josua Yoprisyanto, Syaeful Anas Aklani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) ) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).








