Comparison of FMADM TOPSIS and FMADM WP in Determining Recipients of the Family Hope Program (PKH) Assistance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v9i4.9852Keywords:
FMADM, PKH, Recipients, TOPSIS, WPAbstract
Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (FMADM) TOPSIS and WP methods are frequently employed to identify potential recipients of government assistance. The Family Hope Program (PKH) is a government social assistance program designed to improve the welfare of underprivileged individuals. However, the process of distributing this assistance often faces obstacles in the form of inaccuracy in determining recipients. This study compares FMADM TOPSIS and WP to evaluate their effectiveness in objectively determining potential PKH recipients. The criteria for potential PKH recipients are eleven criteria obtained from the social service based on government regulations and PKH assistants. Meanwhile, the alternatives for this study are fifty samples of family data for potential PKH recipients. This study employs a sensitivity test method to assess the accuracy of the results obtained from each method. The results of the study show that FMADM TOPSIS produces a higher level of accuracy of 94% compared to FMADM WP. This study is expected to be able to contribute to choosing the right decision-making method to determine potential recipients of social assistance.
Downloads
References
[1] G. S. Mahendra et al., SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN (Teori dan Penerapannya dalam berbagai Metode). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2023.
[2] N. Puspitasari, H. Haviluddin, H. Hamdani, A. Septiarini, J. A. Widians, and F. P. Irgadanti, “Determination of Land Suitability for Herbal Plants Using FMADM With Weighted Product,” in 2022 5th International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT), 2022, pp. 93–98.
[3] H. L. Sari, T. U. Kalsum, and D. Mahdalena, “The Implementation of Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making by Using Weighted Product Algorithm in Evaluating Employees’ Performance,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2019, vol. 1255, no. 1, p. 12093.
[4] V. Vydia, S. Susanto, S. Handayani, and M. B. Alam, “The Selection of Learning Platforms to Support Learning Using Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making,” Int. J. Quant. Res. Model., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2022.
[5] W. R. K. Jayawardani and Maryam, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan dengan Implementasi Metode SAW dan Pembobotan ROC,” Emit. J. Tek. ELektro, vol. 22, p. 1, 2022, doi: 10.23917/emitor.v22i2.18411 2.18411.
[6] I. R. Mukhlis et al., “Penerapan Metode Weighted Product dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputu[1] I. R. Mukhlis et al., ‘Penerapan Metode Weighted Product dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Program Penerimaan Bantuan Beras,’ J. Comput. Sci. Vis. Commun. Des., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 476–490, ,” J. Comput. Sci. Vis. Commun. Des., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 476–490, 2024.
[7] G. Susilo, M. A. Machmudi, S. Wahyudiono, and K. I. Santoso, “Implementasi Metode FMADM dan SAW pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penyaluran Bantuan Rumah Tidak Layak Huni,” Go Infotech J. Ilm. STMIK AUB, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2024.
[8] L. I. Prahartiwi and D. Rosita, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Langsung Tunai Menggunakan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Di Desa Sukatenang,” J. Khatulistiwa Inform., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 28–33, 2022.
[9] A. Hamid et al., “Decision Support System for Program Indonesia Pintar Recipients Using the Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method,” J. Inf. Syst. Explor. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, 2023.
[10] M. I. S. Koryoga and I. Suharjo, “Seleksi Penerima Kartu Menuju Sejahtera (KMS) Menggunakan Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (FMADM) dengan Metode SAW,” KONSTELASI Konvergensi Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 290–301, 2021.
[11] R. W. Dari, S. Sapriadi, and A. E. Syaputra, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Penentuan Penerima Beasiswa Perguruan Tinggi,” J. KomtekInfo, pp. 64–70, 2024.
[12] M. Fikri, F. Helmiah, and P. Putri, “Sistem pendukung keputusan penentuan penerimaan bantuan pangan non tunai menerapkan metode simple additive weighting (SAW),” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 490–499, 2022.
[13] H. Husaeni, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Bantuan Pkh Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” JMBI (Journal Mark. Bus. Intell., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2024.
[14] N. Rahmadani, F. M. Yuma, Dahriansah, R. Fauziah, C. Latiffani, and A. Faturrohim, “Analysis of MAUT methods in determining recipients for the hope family program (PKH),” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2024, vol. 3024, no. 1, p. 40008.
[15] H. M. Valentine, S. Ramos, F. Nugroho, and M. Mesran, “Penerapan Metode ROC-TOPSIS dalam Keputusan Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan,” J. Comput. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 203–211, 2022, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i1.2541.
[16] A. Z. Nurmaya, B. Harijanto, and K. S. Batubulan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Menggunakan Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART)(Studi Kasus: Desa Kemudi),” J. Ilm. Inform., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 136–146, 2022.
[17] F. Irawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Menggunakan Metode AHP Dan TOPSIS (Studi Kasus: Kelurahan Sribasuki Kotabumi),” Aisyah J. Informatics Electr. Eng, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 171–178, 2020.
[18] A. Arsita, S. Salmon, and H. Pratiwi, “Implementation of Multi Objective Optimization on the Basic of Ratio Analysis Method in Decision Support System for Hope Family Program Assistance Recipients in Kelinjau Ulu Village,” Tepian, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 161–166, 2021.
[19] M. Sartika and D. Murni, “The Elimination Et Choix Traduisant La Realite (ELECTRE) Method in Determining Priority for Acceptance of the Family Hope Program (Jorong Sawah Kareh Nagari Balimbing),” Math. J. Model. Forecast., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 66–77, 2023.
[20] F. Muttakin, K. N. Fatwa, and S. Sarbaini, “Implementasi Additive Ratio Assessment Model untuk Rekomendasi Penerima Manfaat Program Keluarga Harapan,” SITEKIN J. Sains, Teknol. Dan Ind., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2021.
[21] N. N. Farih and W. Hadikurniawati, “Penerapan Metode AHP dan Metode TOPSIS dalam Menentukan Asisten Laboratorium Komputer,” J. Sains Komput. Inform., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2023.
[22] A. D. Christiana and E. Mailoa, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Berbasis Website dengan Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS,” AITIJurnal Teknol. Inf., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 31–47, 2022.
[23] D. Fransiska, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan E-Commerce Terbaik menggunakan Metode Weight Product,” J. PROSISKO, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 41–48, 2023.
[24] D. Hermansyah, A. R. Natasya, I. R. Mukhlis, S. A. Laga, and G. Suprianto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Menentukan Pemilihan Lokasi Perumahan Strategis di Sidoarjo dengan Metode Weighted Product,” INTEGER J. Inf. Technol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 141–150, 2023.
[25] F. Ramadhani, Al-Khowarizmi, and I. P. Sari, “Implementasi Metode TOPSIS dalam Menangani Masalah Pengalokasian Dosen Pembimbing Skripsi di Lingkungan Fakultas Ilmu Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara,” InfoTekJar J. Nas. Inform. dan Teknol. Jar., vol. 6, no. 104–110, 2021, doi: 10.30743/infotekjar.v6i1.4363.
[26] Azahari, P. Pahrudin, and Yunita, “Penerapan Metode Topsis Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Penerima Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1688–1696, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i3.2290.
[27] V. S. Gunawan, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan dalam Optimalisasi Pemberian Insentif Terhadap Pemasok Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS,” J. Inform. Ekon. Bisnis, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 101–108, 2021, doi: 10.37034/infeb.v3i3.86.
[28] E. K. Suni and S. A. Sutresno, “Rekomendasi Content Creator Terbaik sebagai Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian pada Agensi Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 414–422, 2023, doi: 10.47065/bits.v5i2.4082.
[29] H. J. V. Sianturi and L. T. Sianturi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Memilih BTS ( Base Transceiver Station ) Service Terburuk dengan Menerapkan Fuzzy MADM,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 26–30, 2021, doi: 10.47065/bits.v3i1.164.
[30] K. Letelay, S. A. S. Mola, and D. P. Snae, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS dalam Sistem Pengambilan Keputusan Pemberian Bantuan Rehabilitasi Rumah,” J. Dialekt. Inform., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 54–59, 2023, doi: 10.24176/detika.v3i2.10251.
[31] M. Y. Permadi, E. F. Ripanti, and R. Septiriana, “Model Pemilihan Rumah Tinggal dengan Metode Weighted Product ( WP ),” J. Sist. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 02, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 2023, doi: 10.26418/justin.v2i1.60604.
[32] M. Magdalena and F. P. S, “Implementasi Metode Weighted Product (WP) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Bonus Karyawan,” J. Tek. Inform. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2158–2170, 2021.
[33] T. I. Fajri, “Grouping Student Achievement Data in a Decision Making System Using the Weight Product Method,” JURTEKSI (Jurnal Teknol. dan Sist. Informasi), vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 661–668, 2024, doi: 10.33330/jurteksi.v10i4.3194.
[34] L. Naben, K. Letelay, and E. S. Y. Pandie, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Lokasi Lahan Pertanian Untuk Budidaya Tanaman Jeruk Keprok Menggunakan Fuzzy Multi Atribute Decission Making (FMADM) Dan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J-Icon J. Komput. Dan Inform., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 139–144, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Novianti Puspitasari, Wendy Kurniati, Heliza Rahmania Hatta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) ) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
