Resilient IoT-Based Heat Treatment Temperature Monitoring System with Offline Synchronization

Authors

  • Ariananda Panduaji Marsailla Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Hafiyyan Putra Pratama Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i5.14059

Keywords:

Internet of Things (IoT), IoT Temperature Monitoring, Catch-up Synchronization, Network resilience, Offline buffering

Abstract

Manual temperature recording during the heat treatment process is prone to human error and does not support continuous real-time monitoring. This research develops and evaluates an IoT-based temperature monitoring system featuring offline buffering, WiFi disruption detection-recovery, and catch-up synchronization mechanisms. The system uses a three-layer architecture (hardware, backend, frontend) based on an ESP32 microcontroller with dual DS18B20 sensors, a PHP/MySQL backend, and an HTML5/JavaScript dashboard. Five key technical designs were validated through quantitative testing on a controlled local network simulating the plant's operational conditions. The measured real-time data latency averaged 0.7 and 0.6 seconds for the two sensors, well under the 2-second target. Offline buffering and catch-up synchronization recovered 99.5% of buffered data (199 of 200 points) in the initial trials, the single failure attributed to a since-remediated firmware defect. Post-remediation trials showed no loss of retained data under near-capacity and overflow conditions and idempotent handling of REST API failures, although data buffered before a restart was lost. Zombie WiFi detection functioned reliably under both critical and self-recovering disruption conditions. REST API uptime reached 99.32% and 99.49% across day- and night-shift simulations, and DataMerger ran without producing duplicate entries or data gaps. An alternating timeout characteristic was additionally observed in the single-threaded ESP32 firmware architecture. The system met the proposed targets under the tested conditions, demonstrating that a layered network resilience approach can improve the reliability and integrity of industrial temperature monitoring. However, validation under actual heat treatment chamber conditions remains a direction for future work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] G. Cangondo, R. P. O. Pinto, and B. M. C. Silva, “Incentive-based reputation and cooperation mechanisms for intermittent IoT networks: A survey,” Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 190, p. 104276, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2026.104276.

[2] S. Hassan et al., “Real-Time Investigation of Cross-Technology Interference in Heterogeneous IoT Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 112223–112235, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3321221.

[3] S. Lazzaro, V. De Angelis, A. M. Mandalari, and F. Buccafurri, “A black-box assessment of authentication and reliability in consumer IoT devices,” Pervasive Mob. Comput., vol. 110, p. 102045, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2025.102045.

[4] A. Lamberty, H. Sundmaeker, G. Große Hovest, M. Dechert, and J. Kreyenschmidt, “Development of a generic implementation concept for autonomous IoT-based temperature monitoring in multi-stakeholder food supply networks,” Sustain. Futur., vol. 11, p. 101890, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2026.101890.

[5] C. D. Vo, T.-T. Nguyen, and D. A. Dang, “A low-cost IoT architecture with RF communication and data analytics for real-time productivity monitoring in garment manufacturing,” iScience, vol. 29, no. 1, p. 114536, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.114536.

[6] A. K. Trivedi, P. Jain, and G. S. Chhabra, “ParkSync: IoT-Based Smart Parking Availability Tracker & Billing System,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 282, pp. 2500–2508, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2026.06.020.

[7] C. M. Nkinyam, C. O. Ujah, C. O. Asadu, B. Anyaka, and P. A. Olubambi, “Development of a low-cost monitoring device for solar electric (PV) system using internet of things (IoT),” Results Eng., vol. 28, p. 107324, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107324.

[8] R. Van Dinter et al., “Reference Architecture for IoT-Based Predictive Maintenance Systems Using Digital Twins,” 2024, SSRN. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.5014879.

[9] L. Li, C. Z. Liu, K. Cao, Z. Zhou, and M. Alrowaily, “Artificial intelligence of things for smart agriculture with optimal embedded edge intelligence,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 133, p. 111039, May 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2026.111039.

[10] S. S. A. Begum, S. Mande, S. Jameer, D. Veeraiah, Md. Amanatulla, and P. Eswaraiah, “An IoT and Sensor-Based Intelligent Framework for Data-Driven Precision Agriculture and Sustainable Resource Management,” Frankl. Open, p. 100726, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.fraope.2026.100726.

[11] M. Kashyap, A. K. Dev, and V. Sharma, “Implementation and analysis of EMQX broker for MQTT protocol in the Internet of Things,” E-Prime - Adv. Electr. Eng. Electron. Energy, vol. 10, p. 100846, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.prime.2024.100846.

[12] R. K. Sharma and G. Verma, “Design and analysis of an automated power control system for smart buildings using IoT communication protocols,” Results Eng., vol. 30, p. 110299, Jun. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2026.110299.

[13] D. P. Kartikasari, A. Tobing, A. Bhawiyuga, A. Kusyanti, and N. Hevy, “A store-forward method for biosignal acquisition in smart healthcare system utilizing wearable IoT device,” Kinet. Game Technol. Inf. Syst. Comput. Netw. Comput. Electron. Control, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 51–58, Feb. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/kinetik.v6i1.1154.

[14] M. Marin-de-Yzaguirre, O. Fuste, and J. A. Ruiz-de-Azua, “Study to integrate Delay-Tolerant Network protocols in IoT LEO constellations for flood prevention,” Acta Astronaut., vol. 225, pp. 968–977, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.09.004.

[15] R. Tiberti et al., “Automated high frequency monitoring of Lake Maggiore through in situ sensors: system design, field test and data quality control,” J. Limnol., vol. 80, no. 2, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.4081/jlimnol.2021.2011.

[16] I. Zyrianoff, L. Gigli, F. Montori, L. Sciullo, C. Kamienski, and M. Di Felice, “CACHE-IT: A distributed architecture for proactive edge caching in heterogeneous IoT scenarios,” Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 156, p. 103413, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103413.

[17] L. Castro García et al., “I-Canopy: A resilient IoT platform for adaptive environmental monitoring at the edge,” Smart Agric. Technol., vol. 12, p. 101611, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2025.101611.

[18] L. Zeping, N. Abdullah, and M. K. Ishak, “Smart greenhouse climate control with real-time fault detection and energy-aware automation,” Smart Agric. Technol., vol. 13, p. 101707, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2025.101707.

[19] N. Chamara, Y. Ge, and S. Russo, “FireLog: An open-source, low-cost system for temperature logging during wildland fires with high spatial and temporal resolution,” HardwareX, vol. 24, p. e00722, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ohx.2025.e00722.

[20] M. Todd, A. J. E. Gallant, A. Wang, J. Plucinski, and V. N. L. Wong, “Quantifying inter- and intra-sensor variability in low-cost soil moisture and soil temperature sensors: A comparative study,” Smart Agric. Technol., vol. 12, p. 101186, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2025.101186.

[21] E. Alves, N. Silva, W. Júnior, A. Moares, N. Silva, and A. Balieiro, “FreeRTOS Application in a Real-Time Air Quality Monitoring Architecture for Smart Campus,” IEEE Lat. Am. Trans., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 266–273, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1109/TLA.2025.10930347.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-17

How to Cite

[1]
A. P. Marsailla and H. P. Pratama, “Resilient IoT-Based Heat Treatment Temperature Monitoring System with Offline Synchronization”, JAIC, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 4990–5006, Oct. 2026.

Similar Articles

<< < 27 28 29 30 31 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.