Multimodal Sensor Evaluation for Fish Pond Water Quality Monitoring

Authors

  • Zein Rifal Universitas Handayani Makassar
  • Syafruddin Syarif Universitas Handayani Makassar
  • Imran Taufik Universitas Handayani Makassar
  • Mashur Razak Universitas Handayani Makassar
  • Supriadi Sahibu Universitas Handayani Makassar
  • Respaty Namruddin Universitas Handayani Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i3.12656

Keywords:

fish ponds, Multi-Modal Sensors, real-time monitoring, water quality, Internet of Things (IoT)

Abstract

Freshwater aquaculture requires continuous water quality monitoring because rapid changes in temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, total dissolved solids, and water level can affect fish health and pond productivity. This study evaluates a multimodal sensor system for real-time fish pond water quality monitoring and dashboard-based actuator control. The system integrates six sensors with Arduino Mega for signal acquisition, ESP32 for Wi-Fi communication, Firebase for cloud data storage and command exchange, and a Flutter dashboard for visualization and manual control. Field testing was conducted in two tilapia ponds with different initial conditions. Sensor performance was evaluated by comparing five measurable parameters with reference instruments using percentage error, accuracy, mean absolute error, and root mean square error, while turbidity was assessed through functional contrast testing and short-term stability because a turbidity reference instrument was unavailable. The average accuracy of the five validated parameters was 87.37% in pond 1 and 95.58% in pond 2. Temperature and water level showed the highest accuracy, above 98% in both ponds. Dissolved oxygen and total dissolved solids showed larger deviations, especially in pond 1, indicating sensitivity to field conditions and calibration stability. Actuator commands for the aerator and circulation pumps responded within 1-2 seconds under stable network conditions. The results show that the system is useful as a preliminary field-validated monitoring and semi-automatic control platform, but further work is required for long-term drift testing, turbidity validation using a commercial meter, and automatic control evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] K. Zhang et al., “Water Quality Impact on Fish Behavior: A Review From an Aquaculture Perspective,” Reviews in Aquaculture, vol. 17, no. 1, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1111/raq.12985.

[2] M. Marwondo, S. Sardjono, and U. Riswanto, “Pengendali Kualitas Air Kolam Budidaya Air Tawar Berbasis IoT dan Logika Fuzzy,” Voteteknika, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 128, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.24036/voteteknika.v12i2.126090.

[3] “Review on Water Quality Monitoring Systems for Aquaculture,” in Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 719–725. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32150-5_71.

[4] “IoT-Based Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring in Aquaculture Systems Enhancing Aquatic Species Health,” in Advances in Civil and Industrial Engineering, IGI Global, 2023, pp. 406–424. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-0044-2.ch021.

[5] A. B. Wibisono and R. Jayadi, “Experimental IoT System to Maintain Water Quality in Catfish Pond,” IJACSA, vol. 15, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150340.

[6] Y. T. K. Yunior and K. Kusrini, “Sistem Monitoring Kualitas Air Pada Budidaya Perikanan Berbasis IoT dan Manajemen Data,” citec, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 153, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.24076/citec.2019v6i2.251.

[7] J. B. Papolonias, R. Q. Lavilles, and J. I. Miano, “Development of water quality monitoring system for fish farming,” Bulletin EEI, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 2962–2974, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.11591/eei.v14i4.7673.

[8] R. Adriman, M. Fitria, A. Afdhal, and A. Y. Fernanda, “An IoT-Based System for Water Quality Monitoring and Notification System of Aquaculture Prawn Pond,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT), Solo, Indonesia: IEEE, Nov. 2022, pp. 356–360. doi: 10.1109/comnetsat56033.2022.9994388.

[9] Y. Srinivas, C. R. Kumar Reddy, T. Pavani, K. S. Raju, B. S. Parasa, and H. Killamsetti, “Design and Development of Dynamic Water Quality Monitoring System for Aquaculture,” in 2024 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Data Communication Technologies and Internet of Things (IDCIoT), Bengaluru, India: IEEE, Jan. 2024, pp. 1013–1017. doi: 10.1109/idciot59759.2024.10467293.

[10] A. Ghobrini, A. Belhakimi, and Y. Remram, “Design and Implementation of a Cost-Effective IoT-Enabled Multi-Parameter System for Water Quality Monitoring in Aquaculture and Aquaponics,” in 2023 2nd International Conference on Electronics, Energy and Measurement (IC2EM), Medea, Algeria: IEEE, Nov. 2023, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ic2em59347.2023.10419750.

[11] W. Chen, M. Wang, X. Liao, and Z. Wu, “Design of IoT-Based Aquaculture Water Quality Parameter Monitoring System,” in 2023 IEEE 16th International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI), Harbin, China: IEEE, Aug. 2023, pp. 412–416. doi: 10.1109/icemi59194.2023.10270017.

[12] Y. Xu, J. Jin, S. Zeng, Y. Zhang, and Q. Xiao, “Development And Evaluation Of An IoT-Based Portable Water Quality Monitoring System For Aquaculture,” INMATEH, pp. 359–368, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.35633/inmateh-70-35.

[13] R. P. Shete, A. M. Bongale, and D. Dharrao, “IoT-enabled effective real-time water quality monitoring method for aquaculture,” MethodsX, vol. 13, p. 102906, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102906.

[14] A. A. Abu Bakar, Z. Abu Bakar, Z. Mohd Yusoff, M. J. Mohamed Ibrahim, N. A. Mokhtar, and S. N. Zaiton, “IoT-Based Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring and Sensor Calibration for Enhanced Accuracy and Reliability,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 19, no. 01, pp. 155–170, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v19i01.51101.

[15] S. Sujono and S. N. Wahyunugroho, “Rancang Bangun Monitoring Kualitas Air Budidaya Ikan Air Tawar Berbasis Mikrokontroler,” epic, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 19–25, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.32764/epic.v5i4.994.

[16] Z. Wang et al., “Hypoxia-induced physiological responses in fish: From organism to tissue to molecular levels,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 267, p. 115609, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115609.

[17] J. Trevathan and D. Nguyen, “Adaptive IoT Technology for Measuring Salinity, Dissolved Oxygen, and pH in Aquatic Environments:,” International Journal of Hyperconnectivity and the Internet of Things, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.4018/IJHIoT.294894.

[18] T. Abinaya, J. Ishwarya, and M. Maheswari, “A Novel Methodology for Monitoring and Controlling of Water Quality in Aquaculture using Internet of Things (IoT),” in 2019 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India: IEEE, Jan. 2019, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/iccci.2019.8821988.

[19] J. Alcalá, J. A. Juárez, V. Cárdenas, S. Charre-Ibarra, J. González-Rivera, and J. Gudiño-Lau, “Balancing Cost and Precision: An Experimental Evaluation of Sensors for Monitoring in Electrical Generation Systems,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 22, p. 7052, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.3390/s25227052.

[20] T. Chai and R. R. Draxler, “Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature,” Geosci. Model Dev., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1247–1250, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

[1]
Z. Rifal, S. Syarif, I. Taufik, M. Razak, S. Sahibu, and R. Namruddin, “Multimodal Sensor Evaluation for Fish Pond Water Quality Monitoring”, JAIC, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2349–2356, Jun. 2026.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.