Comparative Analysis of Two-Ray and COST-231 Propagation Models on Point-to-Point Wireless System BER Performance

Authors

  • Nurhadi Ramadhan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Endah Setyowati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30871/jaic.v10i2.12525

Keywords:

Bit Error Rate, COST-231, OFDM, Two-Ray Model, Wireless Propagation

Abstract

This study presents a simulation-based comparative analysis of Two-Ray Ground Reflection and COST-231 Hata propagation models on Bit Error Rate (BER) performance in point-to-point OFDM wireless systems. Evaluation is conducted in a semi-urban campus environment at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) Purwakarta over 500 m at 1.8 GHz, representing mixed Line-of-Sight/Non-Line-of-Sight conditions with vegetation and building obstacles. The system employs 16-QAM OFDM with 256 subcarriers, a 64-sample cyclic prefix, and Zero-Forcing equalization. Two-Ray integrates zone-specific attenuation (60 dB vegetation, 4.5 dB knife-edge diffraction, 2 dB scattering) yielding 147.4 dB path loss, while COST-231 with flat Rayleigh fading predicts 129.2 dB—an 18.2 dB difference equivalent to 66-fold power ratio. BER performance is assessed through Monte Carlo simulation framework. Despite substantial path loss disparity, both models achieve target BER of 〖10〗^(-6) at nearly identical SNR thresholds: 18.5687 dB (Two-Ray) versus 18.5271 dB (COST-231), corresponding to 0.0416 dB marginal difference. Results demonstrate that while BER performance remains equivalent with proper OFDM equalization and adequate cyclic prefix, propagation model choice critically impacts link budget planning. COST-231 offers 18.2 dB lower power requirements for suburban deployments, making it more suitable for practical network planning despite equivalent BER performance. This research provides an integrative framework connecting large-scale propagation modeling with system-level BER evaluation, offering practical guidance for model selection in semi-urban point-to-point deployments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. H. Alhaj, A. A. Bakhit, dan R. E. Abdellatif, “Analysis of Bit Error Rate in Binary Phase Shift Keying Modulation Scheme Using Matlab,” Humanit. Nat. Sci. J., vol. 4, no. 3, Mar 2023, doi: 10.53796/hnsj4310.

[2] I. Trigui, E. K. Agbogla, M. Benjillali, W. Ajib, dan W.-P. Zhu, “Bit Error Rate Analysis for Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces with Phase Errors,” 8 Januari 2021, arXiv: arXiv:2101.03162. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2101.03162.

[3] Z. Shakir, A. Al-Thaedan, R. Alsabah, M. Salah, A. AlSabbagh, dan J. Zec, “Performance analysis for a suitable propagation model in outdoor with 2.5 GHz band,” Bull. Electr. Eng. Inform., vol. 12, no. 3, hlm. 1478–1485, Jun 2023, doi: 10.11591/eei.v12i3.5006.

[4] M. B. Abdullahi dan S. A. Haulat, “Comparative Analysis and Optimization of Okumura-Hata and COST 231 Propagation Models with Field Measurements in Sokoto Metropolis, Nigeria,” Int. J. Adv. Eng. Manag., vol. 7, no. 5, hlm. 145–149, Mei 2025, doi: 10.35629/5252-0705145149.

[5] J. Akanni, A. Isa Abdurrhaman, O. Ogunbiyi, B. J. Olufeagba, dan Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria, “A modified cost-231-hata path loss model for typical semi-urban environments in Nigeria,” KIU J. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, hlm. 112–120, Mei 2024, doi: 10.59568/KJSET-2024-3-1-11.

[6] E. Çerçi dan Y. Dalveren, “A Propagation Study Of Xbee P2p Links For Short-Range Iot Applications In Outdoor Environments At 868 MHZ,” Mugla J. Sci. Technol., vol. 11, no. 1, hlm. 45–54, Jun 2025, doi: 10.22531/muglajsci.1681856.

[7] H. Hashemi, J. Haghighat, M. Eslami, dan K. Navaie, “Amplify-and-Forward Relaying With Maximal Ratio Combining Over Fluctuating Two-Ray Channel: Non-Asymptotic and Asymptotic Performance Analysis,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 12, hlm. 7446–7459, Des 2020, doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2020.3024579.

[8] H. A. H. Alobaidy, M. Jit Singh, M. Behjati, R. Nordin, dan N. F. Abdullah, “Wireless Transmissions, Propagation and Channel Modelling for IoT Technologies: Applications and Challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, hlm. 24095–24131, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3151967.

[9] Monika, Amandeep, Kirti, Arjoo, dan Varsha, “Performance Evaluation of 5G Network Technology,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Manag., vol. 09, no. 06, hlm. 1–9, Jun 2025, doi: 10.55041/IJSREM51000.

[10] L. Hota, B. P. Nayak, A. Kumar, B. Sahoo, dan G. G. Md. N. Ali, “A Performance Analysis of VANETs Propagation Models and Routing Protocols,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, hlm. 1379, Jan 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031379.

[11] E. L. Omoze dan F. O. Edeko, “Statistical tuning of cost 231 Hata model in deployed 1800mhz GSM networks for a rural environment,” Niger. J. Technol., vol. 39, no. 4, hlm. 1216–1222, Mar 2021, doi: 10.4314/njt.v39i4.30.

[12] E. Zedini, A. Kammoun, H. Soury, M. Hamdi, dan M.-S. Alouini, “Performance Analysis of Dual-Hop Underwater Wireless Optical Communication Systems over Mixture Exponential-Generalized Gamma Turbulence Channels,” 5 Juli 2020, arXiv: arXiv:2007.03461. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2007.03461.

[13] A. A. A. Boulogeorgos dan A. Alexiou, “Performance Analysis of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Assisted Wireless Systems and Comparison With Relaying,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, hlm. 94463–94483, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995435.

[14] A. Al-Rimawi dan A. Al-Dweik, “On the Performance of RIS-Assisted Communications With Direct Link Over κ-μ Shadowed Fading,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 3, hlm. 2314–2328, 2022, doi: 10.1109/OJCOMS.2022.3224562.

[15] S. Li dan L. Yang, “Performance Analysis of Dual-Hop THz Transmission Systems over α-μ Fading Channels with Pointing Errors,” 28 Juli 2021, arXiv: arXiv:2107.13166. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2107.13166.

[16] C. Priya, D. Kumutha, M. Shilpa, K. Jayanthi, dan S. Baskaran, “H∞-dCNN: Enhancing the SNR using Deep Learning Algorithm in Wireless Communication System,” 17 Mei 2021, In Review. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-491094/v1.

[17] E. Kriukova dkk., “Impact of signal-to-noise ratio and contrast definition on the sensitivity assessment and benchmarking of fluorescence molecular imaging systems,” J. Biomed. Opt., vol. 30, no. S1, Jul 2024, doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.30.S1.S13703.

[18] C. Zhang, Y. He, dan Q. Yu, “Signal-to-Noise Ratio Model and Imaging Performance Analysis of Photonic Integrated Interferometric System for Remote Sensing,” Remote Sens., vol. 17, no. 9, hlm. 1484, Apr 2025, doi: 10.3390/rs17091484.

[19] Y.-S. Liu, S. D. You, Z.-R. Jhan, dan M.-F. Li, “Which Signal-to-Noise Ratio Is Used in Simulations? Transmitter Side versus Receiver Side: A Study Based on Long Term Evolution Downlink Transmission,” Information, vol. 15, no. 8, hlm. 479, Agu 2024, doi: 10.3390/info15080479.

[20] Y. A. Zakaria, E. K. I. Hamad, A. S. A. Elhamid, dan K. M. El-Khatib, “Developed channel propagation models and path loss measurements for wireless communication systems using regression analysis techniques,” Bull. Natl. Res. Cent., vol. 45, no. 1, hlm. 54, Des 2021, doi: 10.1186/s42269-021-00509-x.

[21] A.-A. A. Boulogeorgos dan A. Alexiou, “Performance Analysis of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Assisted Wireless Systems and Comparison With Relaying,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, hlm. 94463–94483, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2995435.

[22] Ö. Sabuncu dan B. Bilgehan, “Novel Statistical Modelling and Optimization Techniques of Fading Channel Coefficients for 5G Network Performance,” J. Netw. Syst. Manag., vol. 33, no. 2, hlm. 42, Apr 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10922-025-09905-4.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

[1]
N. Ramadhan and E. Setyowati, “Comparative Analysis of Two-Ray and COST-231 Propagation Models on Point-to-Point Wireless System BER Performance”, JAIC, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1920–1927, Apr. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.