The PERBANDINGAN HASIL ANALISIS METODE ELEMEN HINGGA BERBASIS SOFTWARE DENGAN SIMPLE SUPPORTED CALCULATION PADA KAPAL 50 PAX CRANE BARGE

Meida Perwira Antartika; Budianto Budianto; Muhamad Ari; Ketut Suastika

doi:10.30871/ji.v12i1.1451

Meida Perwira Antartika Jurusan Teknik Mesin, Politeknik Negeri Batam
Budianto Budianto Jurusan Teknik Bangunan Kapal, Politeknik Perkapalan Negeri Surabaya
Muhamad Ari Jurusan Teknik Bangunan Kapal, Politeknik Perkapalan Negeri Surabaya
Ketut Suastika Prodi Teknik Perkapalan, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30871/ji.v12i1.1451

Abstract

Today the use of the Finite Element Method for the analysis of the strength of a structure is increasingly popular. The method of analysis is generally made easy by using software. In this study an advanced storage platform construction structure was analyzed on the 50 PAX Crane Barge vessel. The structure of this vessel uses BV grade A steel. Profile in this forward storage construction platform, the structure withstand loads is 6.4 tons (3.2 tons portside and 3.2 tons startboard). Load conditions are considered to be static, dynamic and impact conditions. The structure of the forward storage platform uses the 75x75x6 L angle bar profile as the main amplifier, each 1829 mm apart. This main amplifier is connected directly to the plate, and functions as the main buffer of the load to be given. The results of the analysis using software in the form of von Mises stress, normal stress, and principal stress. As a verification, manual calculation is done using the Simple Supported Calculation method. In this study comparing von Mises stress, normal stress, and principal stress results of the Finite Element Method with stress results of Simple Supported Calculation.

Keyword : Finite Element Method, Barge, Simple Stress Calculation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akin, J. E. 2009. Finite Element Analysis Concepts via SolidWorks. Texas : Rice University Houston.

American Wood Council. 2007. Beam Design Formulas with Sear and Moment Diagram. Washington DC : American Forest & Paper Accosiation.

Bernarthdus, I. 2015. “Stress, Strength, Safety”. Tersedia : http://www. academia.edu.

Budi, B. (2012). ”Macam dan Jenis Kapal dalam Asuransi Rangka Kapal”. Tersedia : http://www. akademiasuransi.org.

Bureau Veritas, 2011. Rules for the Certification of Lifting Appliances onboard Ships and Offshore Units. France : Marine & Offshore Division 92571 Neuilly sur Seine Cedex.

Bureau Veritas, 2014. Rules on Materials and Welding for the Classification of Marine Units. France : Marine & Offshore Division 92571 Neuilly sur Seine Cedex.

Engineering Analysis and Design Menu Engineering Design Consulting Services. “Factor of Safety Review”. URL:http://www.engineersedge.com.

Genc, M. 2001. The Impact of Immigration on International Trade:A Meta-Analysis. Bonn : Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor.

Iremonger, M. J. 1990. Dasar Analisis Tegangan. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press), Jakarta.

Maljaars, J. 2002. Dynamic Increment Factor in Modular Expansion Joins of Bridges Under Heavy Traffic Loading. 7th International Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Weight & Dimensions. Delft, The Netherlands, June 16-20, 2002.

Mulyanto, I. 2011. Analisa Kekuatan Konstruksi Car Deck pada Kapal KM. Dharma Ferry 3 dengan Metode Elemen Hingga. Kapal. Vol. 8, no. 2, Juni 2011.

Popov, E.. 1996. Mechanics of materials. USA : Prentice Hall.

Sukamto, E. 2014. Forward Storage Platform, No. Drawing 13-012-S-A1-AWB-B-24, No. Project D271 50 Pax Crane Barge. PT Marine Cadcam Indonesia, Batam.

Timoshenko, S. 1989. Dasar-dasar Perhitungan Kekuatan Bahan. Restu Jakarta : Restu Agung.

Timoshenko, S. 2000. Mekanika Bahan. Jakarta : Erlangga.

Sastranegara, A. 2009. “Mengenal Uji Tarik dan Sifat-sifat Mekanik Logam”. Tersedia : http://www.infometrik. com.

Singer, F. “Strength of Materials 4th Editon”. Tersedia : http://www.comsizo.com.