CEISA Acceptance Analysis Using The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Method at The Main Service Office of The Directorate General of Customs and Excise Type B Batam

  • Fuad Arif Rahman Politeknik Negeri Batam
  • Suci Rahmadhan Harianto Politeknik Negeri Batam
Keywords: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Perception of Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, Attitude toward CEISA, Acceptance of CEISA, Custums-Excise Information System and Automation (CEISA)

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the acceptance of the CEISA system implemented at the Main Service Office of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise Type B Batam City. Based on the Decree of the Director General of Customs and Excise No.351/BC/2017 regarding the application for submission of customs declaration documents with the CEISA Application System. Respondents of this research are import and export companies that perform customs services with a sample of 60 users, using a questionnaire as a data collection tool. Based on the conclusions obtained from the research results and by using Path Analysis assisted by IBM SPSS Statistics V22, it proves that the perceived ease of use of CEISA directly affects the perceived usefulness of CEISA significantly. Perceived usefulness directly affects attitudes towards CEISA is significant. The perceived usefulness of CEISA which indirectly affects the acceptance of CEISA is significant and the attitude towards CEISA towards the acceptance of CEISA is significant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adryani, D. (2016). Analisis Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Pengisian KRS Dari Sudut Pandang Mahasiswa Menggunakan Metode TAM. Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika Komputer. 21(1).
Adi, R. P., Kertahadi, & Musadieq. M. A. (2016) Pengaruh Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan CEISA Terhadap Persepsi Kegunaan CEISA Sikap Terhadap CEISA dan Penerimaan CEISA Dengan Pendekatakan TAM. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 143.
Awaludin, M, & Yolanda, N. E. (2018). Analysis of CEISA Services User Satisfaction Using The EUCS Method in The Directorate General of Customs and Excise, Senatik.
Davis, F, D dan Venkatesh (1996). A Critical Assessment of Potential.Measurement Biases In The Technology Acceptance Model Three Experiments. International Journal of Human-Komputer Studies Bandung, Bumi Aksara.
Ghozali, I. (2012). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 20. Semarang, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponogoro.
Huswatun Hasanah, A. A, (2019). Analisis Pembayaran Bea Masuk Secara Elektronik Atas Kegiatan Impor Pada Kantor Bea Dan Cukai Cirebon, Jurnal Manajemen Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi. 14(2). 379–390.
Mintasrihardi, M, Rienelda, B, & Elisyah E (2019). Mekanisme Pengawasan terhadap Lalu Lintas Barang Masuk (Impor) dan Barang Keluar (Ekspor) pada Kantor Pengawasan dan Pelayanan Bea dan Cukai Type Madya Pabean C Mataram. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik
Muslimin, M. (2013). Analisis Penerimaan Sistem Electronic Data Interchange Pada Kantor Pengawasan Dan Pelayanan Bea Dan Cukai Tipe Madya Pabean Soekarno-Hatta. Makassar: Universitas Hasanuddin.
Marolop, T. (2011). Aspek dan Prosedur Ekspor-Impor. Jakarta, Salemba Empat.
Pratama, A. W. (2021). Journal Of Appied Business Administration Satisfaction In Export And Import Activities At Main Service. March, 1–5.
Sidabutar, L. L. (2018). Analisis Penerimaan Customs-Excise Information System and Automation (Ceisa) Pada Kantor Pengawasan Dan Pelayanan, Fakultas Bisnis President University.
Setiawan, E, Antoni, D, & Mirza, A. H. (2019). Analisis Penerimaan Sistem Ujian Online Berbayar Dengan Menggunakan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) Dan Webqual. Jurnal Bina Komputer, 1(1).61–72,
Wulandari, E. W, & Aziz, A. K. Q. (2018). Analisis evaluasi sistem informasi akademik dari perspektif mahasiswa menggunakan pendekatan TAM. 1, 167–175.
Published
2023-09-30
How to Cite
Rahman, F., & Harianto, S. (2023). CEISA Acceptance Analysis Using The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Method at The Main Service Office of The Directorate General of Customs and Excise Type B Batam. Journal of Applied Business Administration, 7(2), 201-208. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaba.v7i2.6269