A Comparative Analysis Of Cycles & Eevee Render Engines In Blender Using The Quasi-Monte Carlo Method To Enhance Rendering Quality At PT. Labtech Penta International

Abstract

This research focuses on analyzing the comparison between Cycles and Eevee render engines within the open-source software Blender 3D. The test results will assist PT. Labtech Penta International and users of three-dimensional applications in selecting the appropriate render engine for 3D model projects with still image outputs. The study aims to find configurations between Cycles and Eevee render engines or investigate them using the Quasi-Monte Carlo method, where the values or configurations in the settings of each render engine are tested using multiple samples. In each sample, the values or configurations are randomly adjusted.

The measurement parameters for this test use three variables: rendering speed, size of the rendered file output, and image quality of the render result, taking into account the vertices and texture nodes on the 3D object. The results of this study indicate that Eevee outperforms Cycles in terms of rendering speed, while Cycles and Eevee produce similar file sizes in their render outputs. Regarding image quality, the results show that Cycles is superior to Eevee. The research aims to find a solution for rendering at PT. Labtech Penta International with stable and effective configurations.