Visitors Preferences and Spatial Interaction Analysis of Taman Krida Wisata and Pijar Park

  • Fauzi Janu Amarrohman Departement of Geodesy Engineering Diponegoro University, Semarang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2646-6779
  • Hana Sugiastu Firdaus Departement of Geodesy Engineering Diponegoro University, Semarang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6881-2847
  • Wildan Ruliyono Departement of Geodesy Engineering Diponegoro University, Semarang
Keywords: Gravity Model, Hedonic Value, Pijar Park, Spatial Interaction, Taman Krida Wisata

Abstract

Taman Krida Wisata and Pijar Park are located on Kudus Regency. Culture and Tourism Departement of Kudus Regency informed that Taman Krida Wisata is a family recreation park with various animal statues.Youth, Sports, and Tourism Departement of Central Java informed that Pijar Park is a tourist destination that offers a tourism concept with a variety of interesting attractions and facilites. Taman Krida Wisata has an artificial tourist attraction, while Pijar Park has natural and artificial attractions. In 2020, Taman Krida Wisata had 2.588 visitors, while Pijar Park was 723. In addition, in 2019, Taman Krida Wisata was visited by 22.836 tourists, while Pijar Park was visited as many as 3.623. The two tourist areas affect the surrounding economy because there are people who take benefit from the existence of the tourist area. Besides, Taman Krida Wisata and Pijar Park have different management, visitor’s distribution, and tourist destination facility. Therefore, Hedonic Pricing Method is used to determine the value of visitors prefrences in the area and the Gravity model to determine the flow of movement berweetn the two tourist areas with nearest district, office zone, and central economic zone. There are 9 variables are used for HPM, namely tourism facility, transportation, lodging, gift center, entrance fee, health facilities, worship facilities, shopping complex, and public service area. HPM Taman Krida Wisata used 131 sample, while Pijar Park used 135 sample. Taman Krida Wisata has a hedonic value with intervals 4.000-4.189, while Pijar Park has a value 3.976-4.160. Based on the calculation of spatial interaction, Taman Krida Wisata has a higher value than Pijar Park.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Evaluation of spatial interaction techniques for virtual heritage applications: A case study of an interactive holographic projection. Future generation computer systems, 81, 516-527.

Dyah, B., & Bandur, A. (2018). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Penelitian. Bandung:Mitra Wacana Media.

Ghozali, Imam. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 19. Semarang:

Irsyad, M., & Syahnur, S. (2018). Interaksi Spasial Ekonomi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 3(4), 475–483. Retrieved from https://jim.unsyiah.ac.id/EKP/article/view/10595.

Komarudin, & Sarkadi. (2017). Buku Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta:Laboratorium Sosial Politik Press

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2012 Tentang Panduan Valuasi Ekonomi Ekosistem Hutan.

Purnomo, R. A. (2016). Analisis Statistik Ekonomi dan Bisnis Dengan SPSS. Purnomo: CV. Wade Group

Sakarya, G. A., & Gürani, F. Y. (2021). Assessment of the Interaction Between Space And Visitor In the Case of the Cité De L’arciıtecture Et Du Patrimoine. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, (21), 341-357.

Schmitz, M. F., De Aranzabal, I., & Pineda, F. D. (2007). Spatial analysis of visitor preferences in the outdoor recreational niche of Mediterranean cultural landscapes. Environmental Conservation, 34(4), 300-312.

Shepherd, B. (2013). The gravity model of international trade: A user guide.Bangkok:ARTneT.

Published
2023-05-11