Factor Analysis Of Working Environment Factors, Worker Awareness, Top Management, Worker Communication, Regulations and Procedures(K3), And Availability of Signs (K3) to The Occupational Health And Safety (K3) Implementation At PT. Primary Mirasindo

Abstract


Introduction
In the era of globalization, companies need Human Resources (HR) who have quality expertise, namely self-management or control, education, and intelligence.The aspect that determines the success of the company is to have an expert and qualified workforce, so as to increase the ability and creativity of work.Human Resources is one of the problems and reasons for every company to survive in the era of globalization (According to Hasibuan, 2014).One of the most important things in the management of Human Resources is Occupational Health and Safety (K3).
Occupational Health and Safety relates to work, work environment, work tools, machines, workplace and workers.Healthy environmental conditions and work tools that are still in good condition can help workers to carry out activities and activities safely and comfortably.Occupational Health and Safety (K3) is one of the important issues in increasing work productivity, to increase work efficiency and productivity the company needs to implement an Occupational Health and Safety (K3) system to support the achievement of company goals.One of them is PT.Mirasindo Perdana as a granite mining company, optimal employee performance is needed to increase productivity and maintain the survival of this company.To minimize work accidents, the company must make Occupational Health and Safety (K3) policies and regulations that can provide information to workers so that they can carry out their duties and responsibilities properly, for the Health and Safety of employees and the achievement of company goals.
In its operational activities, PT.Mirasindo Perdana also pays attention to the work of its employees.In this case the company is trying to reduce work accidents by providing personal protective equipment such as safety helmets, safety glasses, safety gloves, safety shoes, safety ear plugs, and body safety harnesses.Every employee is required to use personal protective equipment (PPE) that has been provided by the company.Discipline in work has not been fully implemented by employees and there are no regulations that are tightened by the company, with environmental conditions, tools, and machines used are still inadequate so that it can cause the risk of accidents.The following general description can be seen from the case data of employee work accidents at mining companies in Indonesia, including granite mines from 2017 to 2020:

Theoretical Review
According to Sri Rejeki (2016), occupational health is a physical, mental and social condition of a person who is not only free from disease and health problems but also demonstrates the ability to interact with his environment and work.A person's health status is determined by four factors, namely, environmental factors, behavior, health services and genetics.A person's Occupational Health affects the activities and activities carried out at work, with a healthy physical, mental and social condition able to increase work creativity and the achievement of company goals to obtain quality human resources in terms of skills, education, control and health.
According to Sri Rejeki (2016), Occupational Safety is safety related to work tools, machines, materials, and processing processes, environmental conditions and the conditions of the tools used affect work safety which have a positive or negative impact on the physical and mental conditions of workers.Work safety is one of the most prioritized in the company.To reduce the level of risky accidents and ensure work safety, the company provides facilities for personal protective equipment as a safety support tool.

Research methods
This research use method approach explanatory study (exsplanatory research) to explain the position of the variables in the meticulous and influence of one variable with another variable.This research is a research that explains the causal relationship (cause and effect) between research variables through hypothesis testing.The approach used in this study is a survey method, namely research that takes samples from one population using questionnaires or research conducted to obtain facts about the phenomena that exist in the object of research and seek actual and systematic information.
This study will examine the analysis of work environment factors, worker awareness, work motivation, top management, worker communication, K3 rules and procedures, and the availability of K3 signs that significantly affect Occupational Health and Safety at PT. Mirasindo Perdana .

Validity Test Results
Validity test is used to see the accuracy of the instrument in carrying out its function as a measuring instrument.If the value of the instrument is valid, then the instrument can be used to measure.The requirements for an instrument to be declared valid are: If the calculation of the probability value of Sig (p) <5% or the value of r count > r table , the data is declared valid (valid).
If the calculation of the probability value of Sig (p) > 5% or the value of r count < r table , the data is declared invalid (invalid).
Based on the Sig(p) value the results of the validity test of the research instrument using the product moment correlation coefficient are Valid for all indicator variable.

Reliability Test
Reliability test is used to determine the extent to which the measurement results remain consistent and stable over time.Testing the reliability of the instrument in this study using SPSS 20 software for windows.The reliability test in this study is said to be reliable if the Cronbach Alpha value> 0.6 (trustworthy) can be seen as follows: Table 4

Factor Analysis Results
Multivariate analysis requires a simplification in the structure or dimensions of the data, so that the diversity of the data can be explained more simply.In the main variable analysis, from several main variables selected k main variables that have been able to explain the diversity of the data.Source: Data Processed SPSS 20, 2021 In table 4.17 it can be seen that there are 2 independent variables that are most significant to the dependent variable (Occupational Health and Safety), with the percentage variance of each being 54.942% and 16.170%.happen.To support the statement above, it will be supported by the component transformation matrix in Based on table 4.18 it can be concluded that most of the data diversity of the 7 variables can be explained by two factors, with a value of 0.948.

Table 4.19 Component Matrix
According to experts in the multivariate field, a loading factor value of 0.55 or more is considered significant.Based on table 4.19 shows the correlation value of each indicator to the factors formed are as follows: worker awareness factor 1 (-0.289) and factor 2 (0.683), work motivation factor 1 (-0.275) and factor 2 (0.601), top management factor 1 (0.923) and factor 2 (0.230), K3 rules and procedures factor 1 (0.947) and factor 2 (0.226), the availability of K3 signs factor 1 (0.926) and factor 2 (0.296).
The process of forming factors by their forming indicators can be seen from the results of the Rotated Component Matrix test .An indicator is declared to play a role as a forming factor intended by the highest loading factor value.The results showed that top management, K3 rules and procedures, and the availability of K3 signs had the highest loading factor value in forming factor 1. Worker awareness, and work motivation, had the highest loading factor value in forming factor 2. It can be seen in table 4.20 following.From the results of calculations using SPSS 20, the product moment correlation coefficient is obtained between factor one and Occupational Health and Safety K3 (Y), factor two with Occupational Health and Safety (Y), and the relationship between factor one and factor two, as will be explained in the following table 4.21.Based on table 4.23 the results of SPSS 20 "Model Summary" above, it is known that the value of the coefficient of determination or R Square is 0.747.Based on the coefficient of determination (R Square) is 0.747 or equal to 74.7% which represents the relationship of the three independent variables of top management (X4), K3 rules and procedures (X5), and the availability of OHS signs (X7) to Occupational Health and Safety variable (Y).While the rest (25.3%) represents the relationship of the four independent variables of work environment (X1), worker awareness (X2), work motivation (X 3), and worker communication (X5) on Occupational Health and Safety K3 (Y).Furthermore, from the work environment variables (X1), worker awareness (X2), work motivation (X3), top management (X4), worker communication (X5), K3 regulations and procedures (X6) and the availability of signs and regulations.rambu K3(X 7) followed by multiple linear regression analysis test.

Analysis Regression
Regression analysis was conducted to determine the functional or causal relationship between two or more variables.Of the seven variables or seven independent factors which one most significantly affects the dependent variable Occupational Health and Safety K3 (Y).Then then do a regression analysis between the independent variable and the dependent variable.Y' = 2,911+0,220X1+-,771X2-,059X3+ 0,454X4 -,149X5+ 3,293X6 + ,903X7 + e to further confirm the functional or causal relationship between work environment variables (X 1 ), worker awareness (X 2 ), work motivation (X 3 ), top management (X 4), worker communication (X 5 ), K3 regulations and procedures (X 6 ) and the availability of OHS signs (X7) on the OHS (Y) variable of Occupational Health and Safety, it is necessary to carry out the following tests:

Partial Hypothesis Test (t)
Hypothesis testing is used to test whether the independent variables in this study have a partial influence on the dependent variable.Based on the statistical results the hypothesis proposed in this study states that: H1: Work environment factors have a positive effect on Occupational Health and Safety K3.This hypothesis is supported if the significance probability value shows a value <0.05.Based on table 4.24 it can be seen that the top management variable obtained t count of 0.861 with a significance of 0.392 (sig.< 0.05).The results of this study indicate that the significance number is much greater than 0.05, so the regression model cannot be used to predict the dependent variable, or in other words, the work environment variable has no significant effect on the Occupational Health and Safety variable.H2: The worker awareness factor has a negative effect on Occupational Health and Safety K3.This hypothesis is supported if the significance probability value shows a value <0.05.Based on table 4.24, it can be seen that the worker awareness variable obtained t count of -1.349 with a significance of 0.182 (sig.<0.05).The results of this study indicate that the significance number is much greater than 0.05, so the regression model cannot be used to predict the dependent variable, or in other words, the worker awareness variable has no significant effect on the Occupational Health and Safety variable.Based on this analysis, it is concluded that hypothesis 2 proposed in this study is not accepted.H3: Work motivation factors have a negative effect on Occupational Health and Safety K3.This hypothesis is supported if the significance probability value shows a value < 0.05.Based on table 4.24, it can be seen that the work motivation variable obtained t count of -0.504 with a significance of 0.616 (sig.<0.05).The results of this study indicate that the significance number is much greater than 0.05, so the regression model cannot be used to predict the dependent variable, or in other words, the work motivation variable has no significant effect on the Occupational Health and Safety variable.Based on this analysis, it is concluded that hypothesis 3 proposed in this study is not accepted.H4: Top management factors have a positive effect on Occupational Health and Safety K3.This hypothesis is supported if the significance probability value shows a value <0.05.Based on table 4.24 it can be seen that the top management variable obtained t count of 4.936 with a significance of 0.000 (sig.< 0.05).The results of this study indicate that the significance number is much less than 0.05, so the regression model can be used to predict the dependent variable, or in other words, the top management variable has a significant effect on the Occupational Health and Safety variable.Based on this analysis, it is concluded that hypothesis 4 proposed in this study is accepted.H5: Workers' communication factors have a negative effect on Occupational Health and Safety K3.This hypothesis is supported if the significance probability value shows a value <0.05.Based on table 4.24, it can be seen that the worker awareness variable obtained t count of -1.280 with a significance of 0.203 (sig.< 0.05).The results of this study indicate that the significance number is much greater than 0.05, so the regression model cannot be used to predict the dependent variable, or in other words, the worker communication variable has no significant effect on the Occupational Health and Safety variable.Based on this analysis, it is concluded that hypothesis 5 proposed in this study is not accepted.H6: The factors of K3 regulations and procedures have a positive and significant impact on Occupational Health and Safety.This hypothesis is supported if the significance probability value shows a value < 0.05.Based on table 4.24, it can be seen that K3 rules and procedures obtained t count of 5.152 with a significance of 0.000 (sig.<0.05).The results of this study indicate that the significance number is much less than 0.05, so the regression model can be used to predict the dependent variable, or in other words, the OSH regulations and procedures have a significant effect on the OHS and Occupational Health and Safety variables.Based on this analysis, it is concluded that hypothesis 6 proposed in this study is accepted.

H7:
The availability of K3 signs has a positive and significant effect on Occupational Health and Safety.This hypothesis is supported if the significance probability value shows a value < 0.05.Based on table 4.24, it can be seen that the variable availability of K3 signs obtained t count of 2.382 with a significance of 0.000 (sig.<0.05).The results of this study indicate that the significance number is much less than 0.05, so the regression model can be used to predict the dependent variable, or in other words, the variable availability of OHS signs has a significant effect on the OSH variable.Based on this analysis, it is concluded that hypothesis 7 proposed in this study is accepted.

Simultaneous Hypothesis Testing (f)
In this study, it is stated that the work environment, worker awareness, work motivation, top management, worker communication, K3 rules and procedures, and the availability of K3 signs have a simultaneous effect on Occupational Health and Safety.This hypothesis is supported if the probability value of 0.000 significance indicates a value <0.05 and cannot be supported otherwise.Based on table 4.24 it can be seen that the calculated f is 94,716 with a probability of 0.000 because the probability is much smaller than 0.05, it can be said that the work environment, worker awareness, work motivation, top management, worker communication, K3 rules and procedures, and the availability of signs K3 signs have a significant simultaneous effect on Occupational Health and Safety.
From the f-test, the calculated f value is 94,716 and f table is searched at = 5% with degrees of freedom (df) nk or 134-7 = 127 is 2.08, so the value of f count = 94.716> f table = 2 .08 and a significance value of 0.000 (sig.<0.05).Based on the results of the analysis, the hypothesis 8 proposed in this study is accepted.

Conclusion
Based on the discussion of the previous chapters regarding the analysis of work environment factors (X1), worker awareness (X2), work motivation (X3), top management (X4), employee communication (X5), K3 regulations and procedures (X6), and availability K3 signs (X7) affect Occupational Health and Safety K3 (Y) at PT. Mirasindo Perdana, the conclusions in this study are: 1.Based on the results of the analysis with the factor analysis method of work environment variables (X 1 ), worker awareness (X 2 ), work motivation (X 3 ), top management (X 4 ), worker communication (X 5 ), K3 regulations and procedures (X 6 ), and the availability of K3 signs (X 7 ) is formed into two factors, namely factor 1: top management (X 4 ), K3 rules and procedures (X 6 ), and the availability of K3 signs (X 7 ) and factor 2 : work environment (X 1 ), worker awareness (X 2 ), work motivation (X 3 ), worker communication (X 5 ).From the results of the correlation test, there is a very strong relationship between factor 1: top management (X 4 ), K3 rules and procedures (X 6 ), and the availability of K3 signs (X 7 ) on Occupational Health and Safety K3 (Y).
increase productivity and Occupational Health and Safety at PT. Mirasindo Perdana, and also provide K3 signs in hazard-prone areas to avoid work accidents for the Health and Safety of K3 Employees at PT. Mirasindo Perdana.